Sunday, March 18, 2007

European Declaration of Independence

Many websites have been talking about the proposal by well-known blogger Fjordman for a European declaration of independence. I first heard of it thanks to an article by Truepeers at Covenant Zone, then I saw that Lawrence Auster mentioned it. The declaration is part of a longer, highly recommended article posted by Fjordman at Brussels Journal in which he summarizes the intolerable situation European nations find themselves in as a result of immigration, Islamization and the voluntary surrender by European governments of their ancient cultures.

A European Declaration of Independence

We, the citizens of the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Hungary, (fill in the blanks) demand that the following steps are taken immediately:

We demand that our national governments should immediately and without delay pull their countries out of the European Union, which should be dismantled entirely. European citizens pay up to half of their salaries in direct or indirect taxes to their nation states. If these nations do not control their own borders nor their policies, and they don't as long as the EU exists, those taxes are a scam. National taxes require national borders. If our national borders are not enforced, we have no obligation whatsoever to pay national taxes.

We demand that all documents regarding the Euro-Arab Dialogue and the creation of the Eurabian networks for "Euro-Mediterranean cooperation" between European countries and Arab countries since the 1970s, as documented by Bat Ye'or's work on Eurabia, are published and explained in their full significance to the general public. Those chiefly responsible for this - one of the greatest betrayals in the history of Western civilization - should stand trial, followed by a period of general de-Eurabification of our laws and regulations.

We demand that all financial support to the Palestinian Authority should cease immediately. It is proven beyond any doubt that this has in the past been used to finance campaigns of Jihad terrorism against Jews in Israel and against Christians in territories under PA control. A public statement in support of Israel against Muslim aggression should be issued, and the money that has previously been awarded to Palestinians should be allocated partly to Israel's defense, partly to establish a Global Infidel Defense Fund with the stated goal of disseminating information about Muslim persecution of non-Muslims worldwide.

We demand that the ideology of Multiculturalism should immediately be removed from all government policies and school curricula, and that the state should adopt a policy of supporting the continuation of the cultural heritage and traditions of the indigenous populations. Multiculturalism has never been about tolerance. It is an anti-Western hate ideology championed as an instrument for unilaterally dismantling European culture. As such, it is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's eradication, and we, the peoples of Europe, have not just a right, but a duty to resist it and an obligation to pass on our heritage to future generations.

We demand that all Muslim immigration in whatever form should be immediately and completely halted, and that our authorities take a long break from mass immigration in general until such a time when law and order has been reestablished in our major cities. We will not accept any accusations of "racism." Many European nations have for decades accepted more immigration into our countries in a shorter period of time than any other people has done peacefully in human history. We are sick and tired of feeling like strangers in our own lands, of being mugged, raped, stabbed, harassed and even killed by violent gangs of Muslim thugs, yet being accused of "racism and xenophobia" by our media and intimidated by our own authorities to accept even more such immigration.

Europe is being targeted for deliberate colonization by Muslim states, and with coordinated efforts aimed at our Islamization and the elimination of our freedoms. We are being subject to a foreign invasion, and aiding and abetting a foreign invasion in any way constitutes treason. If non-Europeans have the right to resist colonization and desire self-determination then Europeans have that right, too. And we intend to exercise it.

If these demands are not fully implemented, if the European Union isn't dismantled, Multiculturalism isn't rejected and Muslim immigration isn't stopped, we, the peoples of Europe, are left with no other choice than to conclude that our authorities have abandoned us, and that the taxes they collect are therefore unjust and that the laws that are passed without our consent are illegitimate. We will stop paying taxes and take the appropriate measures to protect our own security and ensure our national survival.

Labels: , , , ,


At March 19, 2007 5:01 AM, Anonymous zazie said...

Do you remember my writing in a comment "when what is legal is no longer legitimate, it is the right, it is the duty of the people..." ? Well, ther we are, aren't we ?

At March 19, 2007 4:10 PM, Anonymous dauphin_b612 said...

Brilliant! Where do I sign?

At March 20, 2007 12:52 AM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ zazie and dauphin

A document like this should be printed in the daily newspapers, but I very much doubt that it is. The lawsuits would be piled to the sky.

There's no place to sign. This was Fjordman's idea, and he says this is a first draft. I don't know what happens next. If you go to Brussels Journal you'll see that thousands of people have read the document.

Let's hope it leads somewhere.

At April 16, 2007 8:58 PM, Blogger mantra77 said...

Great stuff from Fjordman as usual. In fact, one of his best items I'd say.

I'd add that the document would improve with a hardcore separation of church and state clause to flush out all the PeeCee religious fanatics from schools academia and government.

PeeCee religious doctrine goes something like this:

“If you go against your group interests while black you’re an uncle tom, if you do so while white you’re open-minded. Amen. If you express group interests while black you’re standing up for your people, if you do so while white you’re racist. Amen.”

The PeeCee fundamentalists and pro-minority bigots that infest government, academia and media keep telling us there is a problem with white people and white countries. The problem, it appears, is that they are too racist. They keep saying this problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says there is a problem with asian people and that this problem will be solved by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this problem with white people and white countries is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this problem with black people and black countries and this problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a problem with black people being too racist, I am talking about MY race hatred of black people?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of demographic extinction against my people, white people, the pro-minority bigots and chauvinists agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white racists.

Anti-racist has become a code word for anti-white racist.

At April 16, 2007 9:02 PM, Blogger mantra77 said...

More on the PeeCee religion, this time from Turning Tide:

What is Political Correctness?

The short answer

Political Correctness is the notion that speech is "offensive" and must be censored if it either

* offends non-white minorities, or
* defends the white majority.

The Politically Correct therefore consider any intellectual defense of white group interests to be "offensive". They further believe that the ideas involved need to be censored and their proponents persecuted.

Free speech is the cornerstone of democracy. As such, political speech is never offensive. To quote John Bryant, free speech is controversial speech. The real offensiveness is something altogether different. What is offensive is Political Correctness and its hatred of free speech and democracy.

That's all there is to it. Keep it simple.

The long answer

Political Correctness is a religion, i.e. a structured belief system based on faith. A religion need not have a god, although Political Correctness appears to have one. Its god is Hitler, an altogether evil god that is despised by its followers. In this respect Political Correctness is similar to the Aztec religions whose evil gods had to be appeased with constant human sacrifice. The evil god Hitler needs to be kept at bay with constant discrimination against whites.

The doctrine of Political Correctness measures everything against this god, the evil Adolf Hitler. In this religion, everything that Hitler believed in is evil, and everything that he opposed is good. This belief system condenses to two doctrines:

* Non-white minorities are to be worshipped in the morning
* The white majority is to be degraded in the evening

And is based on this one cardinal faith:

Whites are oppressors; therefore whites deserve discrimination and racism to redress the imbalance.

This faith is in turn sustained and legitimised by three anti-white racial theories:

1. The Unique History of White Evil theory
2. The Unearned White Skin-color Privilege theory
3. The White Majority Deference theory

The Unique History of White Evil Theory

This racial theory holds that "whites cannot evade history". It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against a group based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual participation or consent (in slavery, holocaust, etc.) and therefore denies innocence as a defense.

The Unearned White Skin-color Privilege Theory

This racial theory holds that "whites cannot evade responsibility". It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against individuals based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual status or financial condition and therefore denies innocence as a defense.

The White Majority Deference Theory

This racial theory holds that "majorities must serve minorities unless the minority is white". It is a racial theory because its discriminatory logic applies exclusively to whites. For example, suggesting the reverse, that white minorities in South Africa or Detroit should have not equal but superior rights is widely considered insane.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home