The Battle For Nice

The previous post alluded to a Figaro article about the battle that will take place in Nice between Eric Ciotti, Sarkozy's candidate, and Jérôme Rivière, the current deputy banned from the UMP ticket and running as an unaffiliated candidate of the Presidential Majority. At stake is a seat in the National Assembly.
The following are excerpts from the article:
It is a voting district for Political Science teachers. A laboratory, a test case... A voting district that contains the Old City where posh neighborhoods exist side by side with subsidized projects, where the Communist Party reigned for decades supported by the dock workers and the workers in the tobacco industry, where Jean-Marie Le Pen won about 30% of the vote in 2002. How could Nicolas Sarkozy garner 39% of the votes in the first round and 63% in the second round? The hold-up of the century, an earthquake, a tsunami that carried away everything. Nothing here will ever be as it was.
For once, this phrase heard so often in politics has a meaning. The legislative elections have been turned upside down. Jérôme Rivière, the incumbent deputy, has been removed by the officials of the UMP party. His crime? He was head of Philippe de Villiers' election committee. He never hesitated to denigrate candidate Sarkozy, who for him, symbolized the "soft Right". But after all, from the other side of the political spectrum, that did not prevent Bernard Kouchner from becoming one of President Sarkozy's ministers.
Many members of UMP reproach Rivière for his marginal behavior, for not having paid his party dues, and for having "betrayed everyone" ever since he entered politics 20 years ago. (...)
It will be a merciless war between the two candidates... Each one calls the other a pawn. Rivière speaks of his accomplishments as deputy, Ciotti proudly displays his grandfather's hardware sign from years ago in Old Nice. Rivière sounds the charge: "He will be the voice of Paris in Nice; I am the voice of Nice in Paris." (...)
In truth, Rivière did not expect this setback. He had hoped that Villiers, who rallied to Sarkozy after the presidential election, would ask the President to "pardon" him. But Villiers dropped him. For Ciotti, the surprise is just as great; three days before his designation, he did not know he would be candidate. The electoral baptism by fire is always difficult. (...)
Note: Neither man should have been all that surprised. The removal of Rivière's name from the ballot in favor of Ciotti's goes back to last October.
The article concludes with a description of the way Sarkozy's sudden and overwhelming power in the region has just about destroyed the hopes of the Left in this 1st voting district of Nice. In addition, the collapse of the Front National made things worse for the Left, since it was always able to count on several Right-wing parties splitting the conservative votes. Now it's all Sarkozy. The article speaks of a "Sarkozy hurricane" and of the "magic of the Sarkozy name."
This article was posted at Jérôme Rivière's website, proving at least his willingness to deal with what the MSM say about him. Its author, Eric Zemmour, made some implicit accusations of betrayal on the part of PDV. Here are some readers' comments:
- Mr. Rivière, Eric Zemmour claims that you have been abandoned by PDV.... Maybe you had differences on how the campaign should be run but it seems to me that no MPF candidate is running in your district. Furthermore, I really don't see what influence PDV could have in the UMP... So... What is Zemmour trying to say? (...) Does he know something we don't? Thanks for lighting my modest lamp...
- I don't believe that PDV committed an act of betrayal. Those who already voted for Jérôme Rivière should do so again and thus show their disapproval of the way their deputy has been treated.
- How can you claim to wear the "Sarkozy" label when you fought against him so actively during the presidential campaign? What is the balance-sheet of the incumbent deputy? Nothing!
It could be that both men are (for the moment) placing their hopes on some kind of electoral success within the framework of Sarkozy's rather large and winning movement. Possibly they hope to remain gadflies, of sorts, opposing the President on many of his policies, and weakening the Sarkozy effect.
The maps, from the National Assembly website, show the department of Alpes-Maritime (to the left) and of Nice and its three voting districts (to the right). At issue is the first voting district.
Labels: Electoral Procedures, Jérôme Rivière, Legislative 2007, Philippe de Villiers, President Sarkozy 2007

7 Comments:
nday, June 6th....
Even if I know many American politicians were mainly interested in stopping the Soviet "invasion" of western Europe, I can't forget all the "boys" who were sincere and wanted to free us ; they just came and died on our beaches, probably because they had been so educated that, for them, "it was just the right thing to do"
Seeing the state of the world today, I nevertheless hate to think that they may have been cheated into death ; their too short lives CAN'T have been wasted
So, "the battle for Nice" seems so vain....
@ zazie
The lives that were lost in the two World Wars is the reason why so many people can't resign themselves to what is happening today. So much was at stake, and we WON, and now we're throwing it all away. As you say, it's the way people are educated, not just in school, but in general...
And the current political battles do seem so vain, because the real stakes are rarely spoken of.
"The good men do dies with them..."
@ tiberge et zazie
It may be off-subject, coming from the indirect reference to education, but more and more I realize the real battle is actually in education from the earliest age; not just schooling, but education by parents, by television, movies, music, and by one's group peers. In this way, France and what it means to be French have been re-defined, all without firing a shot. That is why it is so important, failing the right to home school or to control the outside environment, for parents to innoculate their children gently by offering alternate viewpoints, getting them to think critically, value freedom of conscience over conformity, passing on history and traditions, and saying, "you know, things weren't always this way, and perhaps today's ways are not the best ways." Then the next generation will perhaps be better able to understand what is at stake and make better political choices.
@ dauphin_b612
Our comments were a bit off-topic. I think the title of the post reminded zazie of the War. And it just happened to be D-Day as well, so the tribulations of the deputy from Nice probably sounded hollow.
Rivière is considered a test case. The question is: can a deputy make a serious departure from the party dogma and still get elected? If he can, then it means there is freedom of thought within the ranks of the UMP and that the voters appreciate his stands.
However if he loses, it will send a signal to other UMP deputies that it is best to toe the line and keep any divergent opinions for kitchen table discussions, provided your kitchen isn't bugged.
I really hope he wins.
@ tiberge
Yes, it will be a test case, and it also makes me wonder how someone like Dupont-Aignan will fare now. I think the UMP may tolerate freedom of thought as long as it is to the left, but I really hope Rivière wins too, especially if I end up in his circonscription one of these days, RG bugged kitchens or not!
Ca y est! Unless I misunderstood the underlining of his name on the Yahoo.fr election results, I think Rivière did it!
@ dauphin
Thanks for the tip. I will return to the computer later tonight.
As of now we know that there was record abstention, Sarkozy has made a clean sweep, the PS is hoping to limit the damage, the Communist Party is on the brink of extinction, the Front National does not have high hopes, nor does Bruno Mégret or P2V.
Oh yes, this time Cecilia DID vote.
Another test case was Christian Vanneste (Pas-de-Calais Nord) - he spoke out against gay rights and was bumped from the UMP ballot. The gay lobby is out for him. Hope he wins too.
A tout à l'heure.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home