Endangered Species

Here's an article from a French neo-pagan website called Ethnocide, that deals with race, skin color and genes, but in a completely different vein from the preceding post. See the notes at the end:

It is an unwritten law. Unwritten because inherent in our species. When one people is conquered by another, the men in the victors' camp seize the women of the vanquished. Humiliated, exhausted and deprived of a spouse, the male survivors of the vanquished are condemned to die with no posterity. Their descendants are fewer and fewer in number with each succeeding generation. The resistance waged by these men in revolt and their sons becomes less and less vigorous with the passing years. The children of mixed blood ("métis") born of unions between the invaders and the native women and impregnated with the dominant culture, remain for the most part indifferent to the fight being waged by their last survivors of the invasion. If the women of the vanquished hope to transmit their genes, such is not the case of their masculine compatriots. Thus the genome of the vanquished men is the first to disappear from the human genetic reservoir reservoir. Vae victis!

Genetic studies conducted on various populations of the South American continent have shown that most of the genetic material carried by chromosome Y (paternal lineage) is of European origin in these people. While conversely, the genetic material carried by mitochondrial DNA or DNAmt (maternal lineage) is for the most part African and Amerindian. That means that the South Americans are in their majority descendants of the Spanish conquistadors and their black or Amerindian slaves. The black and Amerindian men therefore left a much more scattered posterity compared to that of the white man. This illustrates exactly what I explained (...) The vanquished have nothing.

Note: At that point the author provides links to two short articles, first his own, then a link to Dienekes.

Another very eloquent example. In Cuba, researchers have just discovered that 33% (yes 33%, one third) of the DNAmt (maternal) of Cubans is of Amerindian origin. That is a considerable posterity for Indian populations that were supposed to have been massacred more than five centuries ago by European colonists! On the other hand, concerning chromosome Y (paternal), not a trace of Amerindian genes (0%). History is unforgiving. The Amerindian men of the island were killed in combats against the conquerors, by illnesses imported from Europe and in forced labor camps on sugar plantations. The men left no trace, not even in the blood of their enemies. But their women married the invaders, thus ensuring the perpetuation of their genes.

France at the beginning of the 21st century, while not (yet) having reached the cataclysmic state described above, is experiencing nonetheless a similar evolution. Although we do not have any official figures, you have only to walk down the street to verify that in the immense majority of mixed couples, it is the man who is foreign and the woman European. As in war, the winners seize the indigenous women all the while protecting their own. The whole rhetoric that aims to debase the European woman or France ("I screw France like a whore" says rap group Sniper) is a part of the feminization of the white race, of the idea that Europe is a land to be conquered, a habitat open to all forms of pillage. Are not the notorious "gang rapes" another example of collective violence to European women, just as Russian soldiers did when they seized German women in a devastated Berlin in 1945.

It all holds together. A tribe that does not protect its women is behaving as if they have already lost the war. Many of us don't know this. But our enemies do.

Notes: First, I cannot vouch for the scientific data since I am not a geneticist, but it sounds plausible.

Second, I am not a pagan, nor do I endorse paganism having scant knowledge of it, but I know that protection of their values, their soil and their blood from any external influence is the basis of their belief system. Hatred of both Jews and Christians permeates much of the material posted at neo-pagan websites, and they place much of the blame for the Islamization of Europe on the laxness and/or complicity of both Jews and Christians. But while they sometimes express admiration for the Jewish survival instinct, they have only contempt for pleas from the Vatican to stop racism. They claim they are not atheists and that they have an advanced vision of the sacred. For them Judaism is an ethnic religion, Christianity merely a more widespread extension of Judaism with a strong overlay of Greek philosophy. There is certainly some truth in this, but while some of us may accept these truths as one basis for our civilization, they reject them outright, longing for a return to a pre-Christian ideal they perceive was destroyed by two Semitic religions.

Third, the Catholic and non-religious nationalist websites also deal with the issue of the destruction of the ethnic peoples of Europe, but they are much less fierce in their condemnation of Judeo-Christian values, and the devoutly Catholic sites believe firmly that only a return to a traditional Christian moral order can save Europe. Most French websites (nationalist and Catholic) avoid references to the pagan sites.

Fourth, some of the comments to the article take issue with one or two of the author's contentions. For example, the notion that in most mixed couples it is the man who is foreign.

Despite reservations about this article it is a reminder of what is at stake in the struggle for survival that is now going on, not only in Europe but in America. As some of you know, a recent report that was published at all the American media websites predicts that by the year 2042, America will no longer have a white majority. The biggest increase will not be in blacks or Asians, but, as you would expect, in Hispanics.

A detailed summary at the NYT concludes with these paragraphs:

When the first census was conducted in 1790, about 64 percent of the people counted were white, a bit more than half of whom were of English origin. By 1900, about 9 in 10 Americans were non-Hispanic white, mostly of European ancestry.

The share of Americans who can trace their roots to immigrants directly from Europe has been shrinking. The federal Office of Management and Budget now defines whites as descendants of “the original peoples of Europe, North Africa or the Middle East.” Hispanic or Latino people, according to the same government agency, are of “Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American or other Spanish culture.”

“We may be using the same words 50 years from now,” said Mr. Passel, of the Pew Center, “but I feel confident in saying they’ll mean something different.”

The cartoon comes from Ethnocide.