Saturday, June 06, 2009

Villiers Speaks Out

There is nothing new here. We knew what Sarkozy's vision of the future was: an "Islam of France", "métissage" between races and ethnic groups, dissolution of nationalist, regional, and ethnic identities, subjugation to Brussels, openness to socialism, and a Turkey as closely aligned with Europe as possible, etc...

But it's always sobering to hear it again, from one who knows Sarkozy personally. Philippe de Villiers was interviewed by the weekly Famille Chrétienne. Le Salon Beige relates part of the interview:

- Why are you so focused on the theme of Turkey and Islamization?

- Quite simply because we will see the first transformations of churches into mosques in the coming three years. At any rate, that is what Nicolas Sarkozy told me.

- When?

- I had an in depth discussion with him at Elysée at the end of last year. He said to me: "You have intuition, I have the figures. And your intuition is confirmed by my figures. The Islamization of Europe is inevitable." Careful: it's a process that will not occur overnight, but will take decades.

- Why does this issue appear to be of central importance to you?

- Most politicians have a comforting ignorance of what Islam is and propose transforming Europe into a supermarket of competing religions. Unaware that Islam is not only a religion since, by melding the temporal and the spiritual, it imposes a law. But behind this comforting ignorance of politicians, there are those who know. (...) The reality is that we are headed for a criss-cross (chassé-croisé) with, on one side, Europe and its en masse abortions, its promotion of gay marriage, and on the other, immigration en masse (...)

Note: "Chassé-croisé" is virtually impossible to translate. Originally a choreographic term, it usually refers to a crowded movement in one direction that passes but never encounters a crowded movement in another direction. Sometimes it is just kept as is in English.

- Aren't you exaggerating the dimensions of the phenomenon?

- No. The crux of the issue is simple: Europe is refusing its own demographic future. And it is working with a fearsome weapon towards this end, written into the Charter of fundamental rights appended to the treaty of Lisbon: the promotion of gay marriage. This in turn is accomplished through the principle of non-discrimination and the disassociation of marriage from the sex of the spouses (which appears in article 7 of the Charter of fundamental rights). In reality, there are two weapons being used by European leaders to kill Europe demographically: the promotion of gay marriage and en masse abortions. And a third: the recourse to immigration that is 80% Islamic in order to replace the people who are no longer there (...)

Note: As usual there are LSB readers who question Villiers' sincerity and motives. But this time, there are also many who applaud his courage. He is certainly putting more muscle into his words on the eve of the election.

A spokesman for Elysée protests saying:

Philippe de Villiers is not the spokesman for Elysée. He makes multiple declarations on this topic, declarations that obviously need to be regarded with caution.

Labels: , , , , ,


At June 06, 2009 12:29 PM, Anonymous dauphin_b612 said...

He leaves out the third weapon being used by European leaders which is the "métisso-schtaffel", propaganda through the media of promoting intermarriage in ads, tv shows, etc., and labeling anyone racist who doesn't go along. He is either ignoring this because it is too politically dangerous or he has his head in the sand (the former I think).

I was a bit confused to see Villiers on tv a couple of years ago, criticize Le Pen (and you know I'm not a fan these days) for having a "racial vision of France". This would seem to be contradicted by Le Pen's adoration of Dieudonné, but does Villiers mean there should be no French ethnicity?

It's good he speaks out and I don't question his motives, but he could go further. I know Islamisization and Turkey are big topics, but Africanization is also having a big effect on the future of Europe.

At June 06, 2009 6:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I understand that Nicolas Sarkozy, as a Jew, doesn't care if Christianity is overrun by Islam.

Problem is that:
- Ph. de Villiers is a fraud, has always been a fraud and it's too late to hope he won't be a fraud in the future.
- If Sarkozy's alleged words were true, why does De Villiers end up each time supporting Chirac and now Sarkozy? Why does he always bring his votes to Sarkozy's party?

At June 06, 2009 7:10 PM, Anonymous DJ said...


Is this reported elsewhere or are you the only person fortunate enough to posses this interaction?


At June 06, 2009 9:11 PM, Blogger crusader88 said...

At least Sarkozy was honest in that interview: apparently he no longer offers even the pretense of wanting to preserve the French identity.

At June 06, 2009 10:02 PM, Blogger John Sobieski said...

Of course the Elysee gang will deny it. Too bad he didn't secretly record it.Sarkozy pretended to be against Islam and now, like Obama, we see the truth in his actions and his words.

At June 07, 2009 4:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sarkozy was reported saying 'we will see the first transformations of churches into mosques in the coming 3-years'. Meanwhile in the UK dozens of churches have already been taken over by Muslims willingly given up by the Church of England who would rather see the demise of their religion than actively recruit new members for their congregation.

In Switzerland a right wing proposal against the building of minarets was massively voted down in parliament. Most speakers pointed out that the proposal went against international law and constitutional principles. They also said it was DAMAGING FOR SWITZERLAND'S INTERNATIONAL REPUTATION AND ITS TRADE RELATIONS WITH MUSLIM COUNTRIES.

I have often suspected that European trade and cultural agreements with Muslim countries carry clauses for unfettered access by Muslims into the country and guarantees for the freedom of religious practise as outlined in the Qu'ran. This would explain why our government are defensive of Muslim immigration and reluctant to curb it.

At June 07, 2009 1:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How is the promotion of gay marriage contributing to Europe's demographic decline?

At June 07, 2009 3:22 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ DJ

I do not "possess" his interaction. I translated the post from the French website Le Salon Beige, which in turn obtained it from La Famille Chrétienne - a Christian website linked in the Salon Beige article.

I see that the post has aroused interest. But I was not present at the interview, and I cannot in any way swear that Philippe de Villiers actually reported accurately what was said between him and Sarkozy.

It will not be the first time, however, that Villiers has reported shocking statements uttered to him by Nicolas Sarkozy. A few years ago, he reported that Sarko had told him that the past, i.e., the French heritage and traditions, were of no importance to him. Only the future was of any interest. That quote was widely reported and never denied by Sarkozy.

At June 07, 2009 3:32 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ anonymous

The promotion of gay marriage is a way of diminishing the vital importance to society of marriage bewteen a male and a female. If marriage can be between anybody, then there is nothing essential about marriage between male and female - it becomes a matter of "orientation".

But marriage has never been about sexual orientation. It has been about the union of MALE and FEMALE. This is a basic law of nature.

At a time when white European women are either uninterested in bearing children or having abortions, at a time when traditional marriage as the basic building block of society, is threatened by lack of concern for, lack of interest in, hostility to and rejection of the necessary union of male and female to create a home for children and for the future citizens of France, to support gay marriage is just one more nail in the coffin of tradition.

Note that I do not care at all what people do in their bedrooms, nor would I criminalize homosexuality. But it serves no purpose in the survival of a nation. It is an act performed solely for the pleasure of the participants, not for a greater good.

At June 07, 2009 3:45 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ anonymous

"I have often suspected that European trade and cultural agreements with Muslim countries carry clauses for unfettered access by Muslims into the country and guarantees for the freedom of religious practise as outlined in the Qu'ran. This would explain why our government are defensive of Muslim immigration and reluctant to curb it."

You are absolutely right!!! That was clearly stated in the Strasbourg Resolution of 1974 and subsequent resolutions. Although you are speaking of more specific arrangements.

See the last comment to my January post on "Nice Rally Banned". I don't have the link handy, but I think it is:


(No spaces allowed in the URL)

If the link doesn't work let me know, I'll correct it. I have to leave the computer for a while, but will return later.

At June 07, 2009 4:05 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ anonymous

"I understand that Nicolas Sarkozy, as a Jew, doesn't care if Christianity is overrun by Islam."

Nicolas Sarkozy does not care about the survival of European nations or traditions. He is not acting "as a Jew", but as a man of the times, like Obama. He is interested primarily in promoting socialism and Europe through the dishonest disguise of being a "conservative" politician, something few are fooled by. He has sold nuclear technology to every Arab-Muslim country in the Middle East.

He is half-Jewish at best, raised as a Catholic by a family that had converted to Christianity. His father was not Jewish.

Pandering to Jews is part of what he does, like pandering to Muslims is his basic policy. It is true that many Jews are socialists and nation-destroying globalists with some kind of vision of a multi-cultural world where everyone is intermarried. But these are self-hating Jews. Would you call a self-hating Frenchman a "real" Frenchman? I doubt it. Likewise a self-hating Jew is not a "real" Jew (I am not trying to convince you if you are a committed anti-Semite. I have learned that such attempts are useless).

But the truth is, (IMO), he is a pure product of the cultrual upheavals of the 60's, and has taken full advantage of the Eurabia project - a project signed on to by very few, if any Jews, at the time it was intitiated. In fact, the destruction of Israel was one of the goals of Eurabia.

It goes without saying that if you set about to destroy white Europe through perverted family values and massive immigration, and if Christians don't fight back in great numbers, Christianity will capitulate. It also goes without saying that anyone (Jew or otherwise) who collaborates in such destruction should be punished, if such a day of judgment ever came about.

At June 07, 2009 4:23 PM, Blogger Pastorius said...

Could you provide a link for the original article even though you had to translate it?

That would be appreciated.

At June 07, 2009 7:56 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ Pastorius

Please see my latest post on Links to the Article.

Hope this helps. If I can do anything more, please let me know.

At June 08, 2009 6:46 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...
Visit this site to know better about Islamization

At June 08, 2009 11:57 AM, Anonymous dauphin_b612 said...

@ tiberge

It seems a silly point, but having heard several conflicting reports about Sarkozy being half-Jewish, quarter-Jewish, etc. (I heard Le Pen and Sarko both say 1/4), I decided to look it up. I found this English excerpt in Wikipedia about his grandfather:

"A doctor in the French Army during World War I, he met a recent war widow, Adèle Bouvier (1891–1956), from a bourgeois family of Lyon, whom he married in 1917. Adèle Bouvier, Nicolas Sarkozy's grandmother, was a Catholic like the majority of French people."

So, it seems Sarkozy is 1/4 ethnic French and he should care about the survival of his grandmother's people, but I'm sure he doesn't look at it that way.

At June 09, 2009 1:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Droits civiques pour l'enfant à naître...

Muslim Demographics sur you tube.

Aussi demographic crash via google.

At June 09, 2009 3:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you ask me, identities are for individuals and perhaps cities, not for nations.

At June 16, 2009 6:32 PM, Anonymous Nicolas Krebs said...

"Nicolas Sarkozy, as a Jew" (Anonymous )

Nicolas Sarkozy is not a Jew.

"Too bad he didn't secretly record it." (John Sobieski)


"That was clearly stated in the Strasbourg Resolution of 1974" (tiberge)

Which might exist.

"Jews are socialists and nation-destroying globalists" (tiberge)

And they eat christian babies.

"Muslim Demographics sur you tube." (Anonymous)

See a debunk of this faked video (although funny, especially the 8.1 children/woman fertility rate of Muslims in France) in Tiny Frog, Muslim Demographics, 2009-05-03, Duncan Macleod, Muslim Demographics on YouTube Abuse of Statistics, 2009-05-11, Steve Letendre, Muslim Demographics Debunked, 2009-05-26.

At June 17, 2009 5:27 PM, Anonymous Adrian P said...

Demographics and Treachery

Shahid Malik said

Simon Hughes MP

At June 17, 2009 5:33 PM, Anonymous Adrian P said...

Not related to topic, but important information

Architects and Engineers
Prof Neils Haritt
Infowars Radio

At August 07, 2009 10:19 PM, Anonymous Latino In NYC said...

Here's an easy answer to the Muslim immigration problem:

LATIN America.

Latin socieites. Roman Catholic. Christian. Same Greco-Roman heritage. Western European languages. And very, very good at procreating in phenomenal numbers.

But of course, it's just more politically/econimically advantageous to siphon the Muslim rabble from the middle east so that sheiks, kings, and emirs don't have to share the oil money.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home