Sunday, October 25, 2009

Anything but white males


Here is the story of another very influential and wealthy Frenchwoman, who is working against the traditional white society. The article by Louis Chagnon is posted at Bernard Antony's blog. (Areva is a major nuclear and mining industry):

Anne Lauvergeon, president of Areva, distinguished herself during the Women's Forum Global Meeting on October 15 - 17 in Deauville. For the occasion, 1200 women from the world of business and politics gathered for a few days of "discussions and reflections" around the theme: "Tomorrow!" Judge for yourselves the level of thinking of Madame Lauvergeon, who said of the hiring process: "All things being equal, well, sorry, we would choose, uh, the woman, or we would choose the person who, uh, is anything but a white male, to speak frankly."

So tomorrow holds no future for white males, according to Anne Lauvergeon. Those are sexist and racist remarks from the mouth of a "great French industry leader", remarks that should be condemned by the Rocard-Gayssot law (against racist speech, holocaust denial, etc...)! And so, according to her, no "white male" would ever again be hired by Areva! Through her words, she brings discredit to her own company. We would advise all "white males" who work for Areva, or who hope to work for Areva to take their case to HALDE at the slightest hint of sexist or racist discrimination that emerges from the hiring policies of Madame Lauvergeon.

It is sad, but also fascinating, to examine the suicidal tendencies that are cropping up in our society nowadays. We assume that Madame Lauvergeon reproaches her father for being a "white male". As for her son, another horrible "white male", she has just doomed him to unemployment, unless her words only apply to lackeys, from whom she excludes herself and her relatives! We should like to point out that racism and sexism are perfectly acceptable when they are used in a context of anti-white racism, since no so-called anti-racist lobby has ever raised the slightest word of protest against such remarks.

When racism and imbecility, which go well together, come out of the mouth of a "great female executive" it is serious enough, but when this executive is at the head of such a sensitive enterprise as nuclear energy, it becomes unquestionably a problem of national and international security. This is why Anne Lauvergeon must no longer exercise her function as head of Areva, and as a further precaution, we demand the nationalization of Areva, considering that the chairmanship of the French nuclear enterprise must not fall into the hands of just anybody.

In a sequel to the above, Bernard Antony, as head of AGRIF, a legal association that defends ethnic Frenchmen and Christians against discrimination and persecution, announced his intent to file a lawsuit against Madame Anne Lauvergeon for her "astounding sexist and racist remarks" relevant to her hiring policy at Areva.

Success is not assured.

We wish him well but if he fails, or if the case is thrown out of court, it will be very interesting to hear the court's reasoning on the issue, since Lauvergeon has made explicit remarks that are theoretically illegal by French law. But the court will very likely do what it has done before.

Some of you may remember a similar case at l'Oréal in 2008, when the CEO of the cosmetics giant, Jean-Paul Agon, admitted that a job seeker with a foreign name had more of a chance of being hired than a person with a French-sounding name. Then, as now, AGRIF sued. The case against l'Oréal was thrown out of court on grounds that, by showing favoritism towards those who are ordinarily victims of illegal discrimination, Agon was merely attempting to re-establish a balance that was compromised.


Shortly before the judgment was rendered by the court, Yves Daoudal expressed the opinion that it would probably fail simply because affirmative action (in French "discrimination positive") is the official ideology, via Brussels' directives, which in turn, dictate French laws. Therefore, to condemn l'Oréal is to condemn French (i.e., European) law.

After the judgment, Daoudal wrote:

(...) This judgment, that is radically opposed to the rule of law, presages the next European directive on the subject, and is in accordance with what has already come to be called "balancing", most notably with regard to facilitating the building of mosques in order to "balance" the Muslim religion with the Catholic religion.

And this anti-French and anti-Christian ideology encounters no opposition. Not only is AGRIF kicked out, but it must pay a fine of 2500 euro in damages and interest to the CEO of l'Oréal for frivolous lawsuits...

The mosaic below is from the Wikipedia article on Rule of Law, which also provides this food for thought:

Generally speaking, law is a body of rules prescribed by the state subject to sanctions or consequences. The predominant view is that the concept of "rule of law" per se says nothing about the "justness" of the laws themselves, but simply how the legal system operates. As a consequence of this, a very undemocratic nation or one without respect for human rights can exist with a "rule of law" — a situation which may be occurring in several modern dictatorships. The "rule of law" or Rechtsstaat may be a necessary condition for democracy, but it is not a sufficient condition.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

10 Comments:

At October 26, 2009 1:12 AM, Anonymous Kilroy said...

Liberal women emasculate men, and then when the men are really needed, they will complain that men don't do their job of defending society etc... I see this happen on a macro level at work almost on a daily basis. It's hot-wired into the feminist psychology. I can just imagine non-Western males salivating at the prospect of a fat, lazy and idiotic society just ready for the taking, and, literally, the raping.

 
At October 26, 2009 12:20 PM, Anonymous dauphin_b612 said...

Kilroy is right. And those white socially left women are in complete treason to their men, even as minority women are more likely to support their men which one can respect.

On the other hand, I am surprised to see a large number of single women on a major singles site in France, who have specified men of European origin only in their searches. It gives a bit of hope that there is a disconnect between the real France and the media-inflated France of the self-appointed "elites" like Lauvergeon. Interesting that she is president of a company that pollutes and endangers France and the rest of the world.

 
At October 26, 2009 1:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you read Kafka's "The Trial"? There's a part where Josef K discovers a man being flogged in an office and K's reaction is not anger or shock, but embarrassment and diffidence. That's the feeling I got when I read this article about that woman thing.

"I can just imagine non-Western males salivating at the prospect of a fat, lazy and idiotic society just ready for the taking, and, literally, the raping."

There's a dark side to female sexuality their. Some of them secretly wish for it. A relation of mine twice married a man who would abuse her children and beat her up because she found it exciting.

 
At October 26, 2009 9:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Search the Net for Diversity and look at every photo no white males or white males are in the backgroud. Get these radical pigs in line or you will be sorry. You can crush their movement if you stop their puppet masters women are weak and will do what ever the puppet masters say
Immigration 101 Everything you need to know
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRxonaAxsHA
Should women's right to Vote be revoked?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNKHg15XPIM
This says it all
http://api.ning.com/files/MP6Rr2iSbBl*e5K744h3tNV3NyXqLM4HK4sIHzXyhbl8SF0NV8N42GnK-AA8DZW36gYGZAaL3*gIvPe1Su0wpxH8oQQwKEgQ/patchen.diversity.jpeg.jpg

 
At October 28, 2009 10:55 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's a dark side to female sexuality their. Some of them secretly wish for it.

Are you talking about you?

A relation of mine twice married a man who would abuse her children and beat her up because she found it exciting.

If you know of any child or woman being abused you should report it to the police, stoopid!

 
At October 28, 2009 10:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You can crush their movement if you stop their puppet masters women are weak and will do what ever the puppet masters say


Got news for you, the puppets are males too!

 
At October 28, 2009 2:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

puppet tony blair and his ilk:





‘Dishonest’ Blair and Straw Accused Over Secret Plan for Multicultural UK

Jack Straw and Tony Blair ‘dishonestly’ concealed a plan to allow in more immigrants and make Britain more multi-cultural because they feared a public backlash if it was made public, it has been claimed.

The allegation was made after a former Labour adviser said the Government opened up UK borders partly to humiliate Right-wing opponents of immigration.

Andrew Neather, who worked for Mr Straw when he was Home Secretary, and as a speech writer for Mr Blair, claimed a secret Government report in 2000 called for mass immigration to change Britain’s cultural make-up forever.

It also emerged that:

Home Office Minister Barbara Roche, who pioneered the open-door policy, wanted to restore her Labour reputation after being attacked by Left-wingers for condemning begging by immigrants as ‘vile’.

Civil servant Jonathan Portes, who wrote the immigration report, was a speechwriter for Gordon Brown and is now a senior aide to Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O’Donnell.

Labour chiefs decided to brand Tory leaders William Hague and Michael Howard as racists to deter them from criticising the covert initiative.

Mr Neather said there was a ‘driving political purpose’ behind Labour’s decision to allow in hundreds of thousands of migrants to plug gaps in the labour market.

He said the stance was foreshadowed by a report by Mr Blair’s Performance and Innovation Unit (PIU) think-tank, which said the nation would benefit from more migrants.

Mr Neather claimed that earlier, unpublished versions of the report made clear that one aim was to make Britain more multi-cultural for political reasons.

‘I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended — even if this wasn’t its main purpose — to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date,’ he said.

The report, entitled Research, Development And Statistics Occasional Paper No67 — Migration: An Economic And Social Analysis, was published in January 2001 by the Home Office, then run by Mr Straw.

Most of its key statistics came from a PIU team led by Mr Portes. The report paints a rosy picture of mass immigration, stating: ‘There is little evidence that native workers are harmed by migration. The broader fiscal impact is likely to be positive because a greater proportion of migrants are of working age and migrants have higher average wages than natives.’

It goes on: ‘Most British regard immigration as having a positive effect on British culture.’

Mr Portes remains an enthusiastic advocate of the benefits of immigration. He wrote a report for the Department of Work and Pensions last year rejecting claims that Eastern European workers had stolen the jobs of British counterparts, arguing Britons lacked the skills and motivation.

A former Government adviser told The Mail on Sunday: ‘If the Government had been prepared to have an open debate about immigration, we would not have had the problems we have seen with the BNP. But it did not want immigration policy discussed.

‘It is not a very honest Government. They knew immigration was a hot issue and they did not want to get into a fight on it.’

The source said Labour deliberately targeted William Hague and Michael Howard when they called for tougher immigration controls.

Mr Hague was accused of ‘playing the race card’ in 2001 when he said Mr Blair was turning Britain into a ‘foreign land’. Michael Howard was called a ‘racist’ in 2004 after he went to BNP stronghold Burnley, in Lancashire, to denounce Labour’s stance on asylum seekers.

A Labour insider suggested Mrs Roche relaxed immigration controls partly in response to the outcry she faced after criticising begging Romanian mothers.

‘She was called a scumbag,’ said the source. ‘She wanted to show she was a genuine liberal.’



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1222769/Dishonest-Blair-Straw-accused-secret-plan-multicultural-UK.html

 
At October 29, 2009 8:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So a self-loathing white female hates white males - her parents must be happy - has another bunch of self-loathing white bureaucrats in government agree with and continue to push the agenda from yet another bunch of self-loathing whites who are in Brussels.

Am I understanding correctly?

 
At October 30, 2009 10:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So a self-loathing white female hates white males - her parents must be happy - has another bunch of self-loathing white bureaucrats in government agree with and continue to push the agenda from yet another bunch of self-loathing whites who are in Brussels.

Am I understanding correctly?



Plus oil-money, filthy rich muslims put a lot of money on it, and infiltration:


“To feel and even think that the white race is inferior in every conceivable way is natural with regards to its history and current actions. Let the Western countries of the white race perish in blood and suffering. Long live the multicultural, racially mixed and classless ecological society! Long live anarchy!” - tobias hubinette (from korea)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi


"The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noel_Ignatiev

«Noel Ignatiev is an American history professor at the Massachusetts College of Art best known for his call to "abolish" the white race. Ignatiev is the co-founder and co-editor of the journal Race Traitor and the New Abolitionist Society.»

 
At October 31, 2009 3:46 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

check out the book:


Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that's Conspiring to Islamize America

by

P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home