A Novel Nativity

If that isn't the creepiest nativity scene ever displayed! It's in Switzerland, of all places. Some Swiss cannot atone enough for the sins of their compatriots who voted against minarets, they have to offend, insult, and renounce the last glimmer of reason, the last concern for taste and the last faint flicker of national or religious identity. The picture originally arrived in my e-mail box, and I assumed it was PhotoShopped. Then I saw this article at Bivouac-Id. I really was surprised, though I shouldn't have been. It ranks with Jeff Koons Lobster hanging in Versailles as one of the craziest things ever done in the name of "art":
The creators of this nativity, which at the very least is unusual, declared that the fruit of their inspiration will bring to parishioners an opportunity to reflect on tolerance (!!!) and on Human Rights.
Installed near the main chapel, next to a large crucifix, six white towers two meters high topped with Islamic crescents surround a baptistery where the baby Jesus is lying. In front, an open book presents parallel quotes from the Koran and the Bible (...)
"We have received as many positive criticisms as negative ones," explain the artisans who created the scene, Matteo Casoni and Letizia Fontana, adding: "For us, it is already a success, since our goal was in fact to make people think and to urge them to ask questions especially at this time of the year. The idea came to us at the end of November after the vote against minarets." The two young artists point out that in no way do they share the opinion of 57% of their fellow citizens who want to ban such constructions.
Matteo Casoni, who is a member of the Sacred-Heart community, explains further:
Beyond the political aspects, we said to ourselves that we should encourage reflection on other religions and on their role. In our nativity, the three main monotheistic religions are represented; the Muslim, Jewish and Christian religions. The main message is that of comparison and of dialogue. (...) Saint Francis sought dialogue with Islam, without claiming to want to convert, but with the willingness to resolve a conflict in a peaceful way."
Letizia Fontana, a young historian who works at the Bibliographic Institute of Ticino (Italian Switzerland) believes that what she did is an act of civic commitment:
"Someone pointed out to me that this display does not respect the will of the people, making a clear reference to the referendum. But, for me, in a democracy, the minority has weight and especially in a case such as this one, I am part of the minority, and I have a duty to sensitize the population."
Father Callisto Caldelari, the Franciscan monk who is the priest of the Sacre-Coeur approved the display, which is part of a larger initiative to exhibit about forty different nativity scenes:
"We accepted all the creations, the only requirement being that they attain a certain artistic level. This year there will be more than forty nativity scenes: from the traditional to the one illuminated by ultra-violet rays, and the one with six minarets. Naturally, we only accept those that respect our spirituality, and in the case at hand, the fact that a nativity with minarets is in a Franciscan church only reinforces the message of peace and dialogue."
Father Callisto has nonetheless heard some negative comments:
"Yes! The most negative was precisely the one from the person who said that this nativity goes against the will of the people. I answered him in the following way: the popular will is not always ethical. Here, we speak of fraternity and of Human Rights."
No comment.
Labels: Christmas, Dhimmitude, Mosques, Religion, Switzerland

14 Comments:
Looks like missiles. Fitting..
incredible, and yet not so surprising if you consideer whom it comes from and whom it is intended for!
@ Badboy recovered
You are right. It was the prime minister of Turkey who said it in no uncertain terms: "The minarets will be our bayonets..."
The Muslims do not hide their intentions. The stupid West does it for them.
@ zazie
Do you mean it comes from the Muslims? Or do you mean it comes from "artists"? Or something else?
I only ask because for me it comes from the Swiss Franciscan church and it is intended both to pander to the Muslims and to denigrate Christianity. In other words, even though awful artists did it, it was the decision of a crazy monk to accept it. But the monk thinks he's being a good Christian.
Then again, this may all be done out of sheer fear of terrorism. They haven't learned that the more you pander to them, the more they terrorize you.
Tiberge,
What I meant is : it comes from a PC priest, and is intended for all those who feel "guilty" whenever they are tempted to defend their culture and their country ; it is obvious that they easily resist the temptation ; we must admit that some people are born-dhimmis, and as you point out they are convinced this is the right christian behaviour.
As for the so-called artists or intellectuals, they are interested mainly in money and fame (though I don't see anything to make them famous in their "art")
It would be very kind if you would link to/blogroll/follow our blog:
www.catholicheritage.blogspot.com
God bless you!
St. Conleth's Catholic Heritage Association (Ireland)
Disturbing and scary. No wonder so many patriots have abandoned Christianity.
The Vatican has denounced the Swiss vote, but I wonder what it thinks about such a display.
A reader at my site wrote :
"Those minarets look like rows of ballistic missiles to me. And they seem to be threatening to destroy Christianity, symbolized by the Christ child. So the message I take from the display is that Islam has Europeans surrounded, and intends to destroy them, with nuclear weapons if necessary."
@dauphin: The Vatican is in the grip of madness if it's willing to give a moral boost to people who hate the Church. That's as ironic as secular leftist feminists who support Hamas.
I hope the Vatican will build up the courage this year to denounce the decline of European civilisation, rather than a vote in Switzerland.
@ Craig
I share your dismay, as I'm sure many Catholics do, but I think this was a political stance of interreligous tolerance, perhaps PC, but also perhaps to protect missionaries and Churches in dangerous areas. The Vatican has always had to deal with political considerations unfortunately, even if one can disagree with the policy.
On the other hand, I do think that the Vatican is well aware of the threat to Europe and is working in quieter ways. I believe they tried to fight for the mention of Europe's Christian heritage in the EU constitution, but perhaps another reader knows more about this.
@ craig and dauphin
On the other hand, Benedict has done two courageous things not related to Islam. He reinstated the SSPX (known in France as the FSSPX), a breakaway movement dedicated to traditional Catholicism, formed after Vatican II.
And he reopened the whole case on Pius XII, rehabilitating him, and, with the support of several Jewish religious leaders, including an American rabbi who wrote a book on the topic, proving beyond doubt that Pius XII heroically and humbly saved more Jewish lives than any other single person. The evidence in favor of Pius XII is overwhelming, and yet it was covered up by the Russian Communists (and also I have heard by German Communists, as well as some left-wing Jews).
Now there is a movement to canonize Pius XII, and I hope it will materialize, because I (and my parents) were total victims of the malicious propaganda against him. I grew up believing completely in the myth that Pius XII had stood by and done nothing (or very little) to help the Jews. This came from information my mother had. She was quite left-leaning, but in this case, she wasn't the only one who was misled. It also came from that play called The Deputy by Rolf Hochhuth, a play that deeply affected us and also completely misinformed us. So I think there are good things about Benedict.
Why he praised the election of Obama, why he is calling for a world government and why he was critical of the Swiss, I do not know. He may be a mixture of traditionalist and modern "progressive". I hope he makes a decision to speak out, even if it does result in some violence - look at what is happening anyway. Airplanes almost blown up, crime, honor killings, and the slow destruction of Europe. I can't believe he WANTS these things.
@ craig and dauphin
As an update to my previous comment, it appears that the grand rabbi of France - Gilles Bernheim - has condemned Benedict for his actions in favor of Pius XII. If you are interested read Bernard Antony's homepage:
http://bernard-antony,blogspot.com/
There are several VERY long articles urging Bernheim to reconsider and why.
There is also a very good article in English at Lawrence Auster's VFR:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/015169.html
My impression of Bernheim, from Antony's explanations, is that he is politically much more to the Left than the Right, which would explain his stance. He, like Benedict, however, condemns the Swiss.
This is a huge topic. I would post on it, but it is a bit off-topic, and I need to get a firmer handle on it. I would very much like to see the documents and all the evidence that exonerate Pius XII, but I just don't have time.
"The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church.." - Our Lady of Akita, 1973 (a fully Church approved apparition, BTW. Unfortunantly, most Catholics are unaware of such.)
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home