The Great Parisian Kiss-In
You probably heard about this repulsive event that took place today - Valentine's Day - in Paris, since some English-language sites reported on it. Originally scheduled to be held in front of Notre-Dame Cathedral, the uproar from Catholics was such that they had to move it to Place Saint-Michel in the heart of the Latin Quarter.
The François Desouche website, not known for being apologetic, felt compelled to issue this carefully worded justification, after receiving what must have been offensive, if not threatening, e-mails from gays:
As a result of numerous but dubious e-mails from homosexual readers, we must clarify our position. We did not convey this appeal (to protect Notre-Dame Cathedral from this affront) out of homophobia. It is not for us to judge a person's private practices so long as they involve persons who consent. We clearly distinguish between homosexuals and extremist gays who not only represent themselves alone, but who contribute to the deplorable image of homosexuals, just as extremists and vandals of graveyards with nationalist sentiments contribute to the deplorable image of nationalists.
The appeal François Desouche referred to had originally appeared at Le Salon Beige. On February 9, LSB had posted an appeal to rally in defense of the cathedral, and the Church in the larger sense. Especially after the organizer of the event, Arthur Vauthier, declared:
"This a way of calling on the Church to examine religion and the question of love and marriage between gays and lesbians."
The Church does not approve of homosexual relations (that it judges as "disordered" and contrary to God's plan for Man), but it respects and welcomes all persons whatever their behavior. Which makes this "kiss-in" against homophobia in front of the cathedral of Paris particularly unwelcome.
Strangely enough, the extremists of the homosexual cause do not assemble in front of the Grand Mosque of Paris. We know that in Muslim countries (where sharia law applies) homosexuals are executed!
Note: That is indeed strange.
In reality, the initiators of this gathering know they risk nothing when they mock Catholics. Moreover (...) Arthur Vauthier "does not fear hostile reactions."
LSB readers expressed overwhelming support for a rally to protect Notre-Dame Cathedral from the kiss-in. It appears they won at least a small battle if not the war.
While LSB went out of its way to show that not all gays were in favor of the Notre-Dame kiss-in, I remain unmoved by this. They may have voiced their objection because they didn't want bad publicity, but that does not address the essential problems of unleashed homosexual propaganda in the schools (some even condone teaching about the evils of homophobia in kindergarten!) and the equally unleashed contempt for the Church.
On a related note, LSB conveys some statistics from an Accounts Court report (pdf) on the HIV virus in France and its cost:
(...) two groups represent between them around 70% of the HIV cases discovered in 2008: migrants of both sexes (35%) mostly from sub-Saharan Africa, infected through heterosexual encounters, and male homosexuals (37%) primarily of French nationality. (...)
To illustrate how far down the the moral spectrum the French Fifth Republic has gone, an "educator" named Gaël Pasquier has written in Le Monde the following editorial on the teaching of homosexuality to the very young:
(...) The fight against homophobia is not limited to the condemnation of insults or homophobic remarks. Reacting to insults is an obligation of all educators, but it is not enough. We have to stop presenting heterosexuality as being the only normal, natural and legitimate sexuality. (...) It is not necessary to request from parents an authorization to teach these topics in class. It is nonetheless possible to inform them that they will be taught during the school year. Parents cannot exempt their children from obligatory topics: the fight against racist, anti-Semitic, sexist and homophobic discrimination is part of the mission of the republican school, on a par with learning how to read and add.
It should be noted that Gaël Pasquier is critical of Minister of Education Luc Chatel for his recent ban from the elementary schools (but not middle and high schools) of a short animated film entitled Le Baiser de la Lune (the kiss of the moon). The proponents of the movie hoped to "sensitize" pupils against homophobia. It depicts the different experiences of love, including that of two boy fishes! Not surprisingly, Luc Chatel has been condemned by leftists, including the French Communist Party. (This movie is not to be confused with another movie in English with the same title but not animated.)
The website Les 4 Vérités drew up a petition against the showing of the film to children ages 9 and 10. By February 3 more than 18,000 persons had signed the petition. Again a battle seems to have been won, but not the war.
As Valentine's Day draws to a close, I felt like ending this depressing post with two songs about love between a man and a woman. First, one of Gershwin's greatest melodies sung by an impeccable stylist. The song was featured in the 1954 movie Young At Heart, though it was composed much earlier. Sinatra also released this song as a single on Capitol records, sometime in the 1950's. That particular rendition is the best I've heard. Then the French song the whole world knows, made immortal by the one and only Edith Piaf, but sung here by Mireille Mathieu. "Mimi" over-emotes, but that's fine with me. Enjoy them and forget what happened today in the Latin Quarter.
Labels: Education, Homosexuality, Music, Paris

4 Comments:
The video at the start of the post appears to be filmed at Place Saint-Michel. I once came across a prayer meeting on that very same square, held by SOS Tout Petits, a pro-life organisation. It's strange to think that a place that can be the scene of such a positive thing, can also be the scene of a homosexual "kiss-in".
They complain about being unable to hold their little party in front of Notre Dame. Maybe they need to open a Bible and see what it says about sodomites. There is no way that any Christian church, of whatever denomination, should have to allow such events to happen on its property.
I expected to see a predominantly white crowd and my instincts were correct. Where were all the colored people? This is one movement where I'd like to see the diversifiers take the reins. The queers and dykes need to take their message of love and tolerance to the banlieus: Les Musulmans need to be preached the gospel of buggery!
Everyone wins. The French women would be left alone to breed with their own kind; the African/Maghrebi birthrate would decline; potential terrorists would die off from AIDS; and Muslimas would no longer be beaten if they were in monogamous same-sex relationships. The only disadvantage I can see is that the rate of venereal disases would shoot up. But surely the extra expense of treating sidaïques would be more than offset by the tax expenditure saved on a diminishing number of uneducable welfare brats.
And we know Muslim men are up for the challenge. Muslim countries are famous for their centuries old tradition of sodomy. Why, just a few weeks ago I was reading about an outbreak of gonorrhea amongst Kandahari Pushtuns. I just wish the men would leave the boys alone and stick to their own age group.
As an aside, several of the women shown in the video didn't look as ugly or masculine as the typical lesbian should look. I know there are exceptions, nevertheless, how many of these would have been lesbians in the 19th-20th centuries, and how many were indoctrinated to be that by the feminazi school curriculum?
Craig,
There was more than one kiss-in at Place Saint-Michel on Valentine's Day. The other one, highly approved of by the Socialist mayor was for "mixed" couples, racially mixed that is. It was indeed a day for the most disgusting types of demonstrations and exhibitionism.
As for pro-life rallies and things similar, Yves Daoudal speculates that the day will come when they will be banned. Sarkozy seems to be pondering a change to the Constitution that would outlaw any form of "radical practice" or "prosyletizing". How such terms are actually inerpreted is anyone's guess at this point, but it is not unthinkable that a Catholic rally might fall into such a category.
Then what happens to rallies and street demonstrations from Islamists and other violent groups? They would be protected by anti-discrimination laws.
Is this unfair? Is the sky blue?
This amounts to dictates from a police State, but the French have been primed for this. See my recent post on the burka (not really a post, but some jottings). If you subscribe to Daoudal's newsletter, it's nº 68. It's all speculation, but he's usually right. Even some left-leaning sites have perceived that the new report on the burka offers many gifts to the Muslims in exchange for an agreement to accept the ban.
I regard all of this as a recipe for utter disaster, one way or another - with or without violence. It will really mean the official beginning of the official takeover of the State by Islam + the Grand Orient + Socialism + KGB tactics, all couched in the language of "liberté, égalité, fraternité, laïcité." People will be fooled, because they will have become suicidal.
I've learned, if I didn't know it before, that there is more than one way to destroy a people. You can kill them physically, you can dumb them down mentally, and you can let them choose death - freedom of choice!
I was in Paris on Valentine's Day and saw plenty of couples kissing, but luckily missed this!
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home