Sarkozy the Anti-Frenchman
This video, from Novopress, is in two parts. The first part is from a notorious speech delivered in Palaiseau, near Paris, in 2008, in which Nicolas Sarkozy informed his people that they had to embrace "métissage" (intermarriage, miscegenation), or suffer dire consequences. I reported on this major event in December 2008 (note that the link to François Desouche in that post no longer works). The second part is from a speech in Saudi Arabia (date not certain, but it was after he became president) in which he proclaims that nothing is more dangerous than an identity that has been humiliated.
Here is an approximate translation. This version of the Palaiseau speech differs somewhat from my earlier translation, not in substance, but in choice of words. You will note the menacing tone of the first part compared to the friendly reassurances of the second:
"The objective is to meet the challenge of "métissage". It is not a choice. It is an obligation, an imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We would run the risk of having to confront considerable problems. We must change; we will change. We will change everything at the same time everywhere in the country: in the administration of the State, in education, in the political parties, and we will be accountable for the results. If this cannot be accomplished through voluntary efforts, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more stringent measures."
"My friends of Saudi Arabia, this is not about imposing one and only one model of civilization. That would be repeating once again the tragic errors that in the past caused so much misery. It would mean a denial of identities. It would revive not peace or fraternity, but violence. For nothing is more dangerous than a wounded identity, a humiliated identity. A humiliated identity is a radicalized identity."
And nothing is more dangerous than a leader who humiliates his own people, except a population that has had enough of being humiliated.
Labels: National Identity, Sarkozy's Values

6 Comments:
"The objective is to meet the challenge of "métissage". It is not a choice. It is an obligation, an imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We would run the risk of having to confront considerable problems. We must change; we will change. We will change everything at the same time everywhere in the country: in the administration of the State, in education, in the political parties, and we will be accountable for the results. If this cannot be accomplished through voluntary efforts, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more stringent measures."
G E N O C I S T !
"The objective is to meet the challenge of "métissage". It is not a choice. It is an obligation, an imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We would run the risk of having to confront considerable problems. We must change; we will change. We will change everything at the same time everywhere in the country: in the administration of the State, in education, in the political parties, and we will be accountable for the results. If this cannot be accomplished through voluntary efforts, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more stringent measures."
talk about hitler
dhimmi alain touraine on eurabia tv channel:
http://www.euronews.net/2010/07/02/alain-touraine-on-europe-and-islam/
alain touraine DHIMMI wants turkey in European Union.
«Culturally and politically speaking, Europe does not exist.» - dhimmi alain touraine
why doesn't he pack up and move to an islamic slum?
«Hitler, he only has one ball,
Goering has two but very small.
Himmler has something similar,
But poor old Goebbels has no balls at all.»
"The objective is to meet the challenge of "métissage". It is not a choice. It is an obligation, an imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We would run the risk of having to confront considerable problems. We must change; we will change."
l didnt pay much attention to this piece when you posted it, and then l read it properly two days ago..and l've been thinking about it and really its quite horrific what he is saying and it deserves much wider coverage - what he is saying is really quite astonishing, either the French start breeding with the Muslims and accept that France must be changed completely - because there can be no other solution or there must not be any other solution. l think he is thinking along many different lines here and one would have to be civil war but "It is not a choice. It is an obligation, an imperative. We cannot do otherwise." he is ruling out all possibilities other than acceptance - and submission. This is the most disturbing ultimatum. This man is sick.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home