Tuesday, August 31, 2010

September 4, 2010


The BIG news this week will be the latest Apéro organized by Riposte Laïque. If you were not around a few months ago and need some filling in, an "apéro", short for "apéritif", is like a before-dinner cocktail, but in this context it has taken on the aspect of a major demonstration against the Islamization of France and for the values of the Republic. The "apéro" last June 18 was banned by the authorities from its original meeting place in order not to anger the neighborhood's ruling Muslims, and moved to the Champs-Elysées. Also banned was the drinking of wine, with grape juice serving as a sorry substitute. However, sausages were allowed. The point of wine and sausage was to protest the subversion by Islam of French civilization, including the food and drinks we all associate with France (click Apéro label below for more information).

Last June's Apéro put the very republican website Riposte Laïque on the map, and the outdoor demonstration made headlines all over Europe, with other countries also organizing their own version of a patriotic picnic.

One of the major contributors to Riposte Laïque, Maxime Lépante, will be in the United States during the whole month of September, meeting with the organizers of the opposition to the Ground Zero mosque (another major event that coincides with France's Apéro). Lépante is the now-famous photographer who took numerous photos of Muslims praying on Friday afternoon in the streets of the 18th arrondissement of Paris (click Barbès label below for a review).

The latest Apéro will take place in six French cities - Paris, Bordeaux, Lyons, Strasbourg, Toulon, and Toulouse.

This time beer is banned, inebriated individuals will be removed, and only French flags will be allowed to fly, in order to show unity despite political differences. (It isn't clear if wine is allowed this time.)

The Apéro is being held on September 4 - an important date in French history - on that date in 1870, one hundred forty years ago, the Third Republic was proclaimed. This came after the disastrous Franco-Prussian War that brought down Napoleon III, unified Germany, and (to the frustration of many) dashed hopes for a restoration of the monarchy, which in 1870 was still a possibility.

However one may feel about the Republic or about Riposte Laïque with its left-wing roots, its Phrygian bonnets, its tedious and potentially dangerous feminism and egalitarianism, and its stubborn anti-clericalism, it has to be acknowledged that some members of RL have awakened to the real dangers stalking their country and to the appalling and treasonous behavior of their elected officials. In a mess such as the one the French find themselves in today, we have to be grateful for small favors. Many politicians have disappointed us - Philippe de Villiers, Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, Jean-Marie Le Pen, all of whom attracted and nurtured the hopes of many Frenchmen eager to save themselves and their country. Many religious leaders have both shocked and discouraged us - priests and rabbis who grovel to the imams, cryptic statements from a very intelligent, but overly-cautious Pope. So we may be disappointed again, but it is worth a try, and if I were in France, I would attend one of these parties, armed with good French food and drink.

The poster at the top is the call to resist. The struggle is portrayed in feministic terms - the Republic with her Phrygian bonnet wrestles with a burka-covered Muslim.



The organizer of the event is Christine Tasin, a contributor to Riposte Laïque, and also president of a group called Résistance Républicaine that she founded not long ago in the wake of the successful June 18 Apéro.

The website of Résistance Républicaine is undergoing some maintenance, but here is the message from the general secretary, Gérard Couvert:

The republican "apéritif" of September 4, organized by Résistance Républicaine in six cities of France, marks our will and our capacity for organization, even during an unfavorable time of the year.

It is of primordial importance that each one of us mobilize.

Nonetheless, this event is only the prelude to a year of struggle; our enemies understand this and are becoming more incisive and more threatening. In so doing they are only re-enforcing our determination.

The "reconquête" begins on September 4.

Note: "Reconquête" = Reconquista

Many groups, associations and websites are joining in the resistance movement and calling on the people to come out on September 4. These groups are listed in French at the link provided above. Among them are SITA and Bivouac-ID, two sites that I have often consulted.

Below a cartoon from Riposte Laïque showing the chairman of the French Socialist Party, Martine Aubry, sitting on top of the Republic, waving an EU-Islamic flag, and proclaiming that "Sarkozy is destroying France and her values."

The irony is that Sarkozy IS destroying France with the same values as the Socialist Party! It's just that he disbanded a few illegal gypsy camps, and made idle threats about deporting a few criminals, and that is sufficient for the Socialists to bemoan the racism and xenophobia of the man who opened the borders, shoved his country into the EU, ordered his police not to harm immigrant criminals, and proclaimed "métissage" the new duty of all good Frenchmen.



Much more will follow. The amount of commentary at Riposte Laïque is unmanageable - a small selection will have to do.

One final note: I had originally thought that the Paris demonstration would be held in the neighborhood of La Goutte d'Or, where the previous June 18 Apéro was scheduled to meet before the authorities forced a change. But it is instead being held at Place de la Bourse in the 2nd arrondissement. The French Left (all the groups and parties combined) is also holding an "anti-Sarkozy" demonstration on September 4. Their goal is to make Sarkozy repent for his cruelty to foreigners (or something like that). In addition, Ramadan is still on until September 11 (another fateful date!), and Islamic demonstrations are scheduled to take place in Paris, during this time.

I will do my best to sort this out. I truly hope that Riposte Laïque can bring the people out in great numbers. A big turnout would encourage others, and the movement could grow into something significant.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

16 Comments:

At August 31, 2010 2:00 AM, Anonymous Sancrucensis said...

"However one may feel about the Republic or about Riposte Laïque with its left-wing roots, its Phrygian bonnets, its tedious and potentially dangerous feminism and egalitarianism, and its stubborn anti-clericalism, it has to be acknowledged that some members of RL have awakened to the real dangers stalking their country..."

Wait a minute--left wing anti-clerical republicans are the real danger stalking their country; these are the progeny of the people who ran the reign of terror. I would prefer a Muslim theocracy any day.

 
At August 31, 2010 4:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

«I would prefer a Muslim theocracy any day.»


yack!

 
At August 31, 2010 5:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

«I would prefer a Muslim theocracy any day.»


check out sharia for dummies by noonie darwish

 
At August 31, 2010 6:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sharia for dummies
by Nonie Darwish

1- Jihad defined as “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion” is the duty of every Muslim and Muslim head of state (Caliph). Muslim Caliphs who refuse jihad are in violation of Sharia and unfit to rule.

2- A Caliph can hold office through seizure of power meaning through force.

3- A Caliph is exempt from being charged with serious crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, drinking and in some cases of rape.

4- A percentage of Zakat (alms) must go towards jihad.

5- It is obligatory to obey the commands of the Caliph, even if he is unjust.

6- A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave and a male.

7- The Muslim public must remove the Caliph in one case, if he rejects Islam.

8- A Muslim who leaves Islam must be killed immediately.

9- A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of : 1) an apostasy 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber. Making vigilante street justice and honor killing acceptable.

10- A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim.

11- Sharia never abolished slavery and sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave.

12- Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging and other forms of cruel and unusual punishments even for crimes of sin such as adultery.

13- Non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims and must comply to Sharia if they are to remain safe. They are forbidden to marry Muslim women, publicly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures or openly celebrate their religious holidays or funerals. They are forbidden from building new churches or building them higher than mosques. They may not enter a mosque without permission. A non-Muslim is no longer protected if he commits adultery with a Muslim woman or if he leads a Muslim away from Islam.

14- It is a crime for a non-Muslim to sell weapons to someone who will use them against Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot curse a Muslim, say anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam, or expose the weak points of Muslims. However, the opposite is not true for Muslims.

15- A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim.

 
At August 31, 2010 6:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

16- Banks must be Sharia compliant and interest is not allowed.

17- No testimony in court is acceptable from people of low-level jobs, such as street sweepers or a bathhouse attendant. Women in such low level jobs such as professional funeral mourners cannot keep custody of their children in case of divorce.

18- A non-Muslim cannot rule even over a non-Muslims minority.

19- Homosexuality is punishable by death.

20- There is no age limit for marriage of girls under Sharia. The marriage contract can take place anytime after birth and consummated at age 8 or 9.

21- Rebelliousness on the part of the wife nullifies the husband’s obligation to support her, gives him permission to beat her and keep her from leaving the home.

22- Divorce is only in the hands of the husband and is as easy as saying: “I divorce you” and becomes effective even if the husband did not intend it.

23- There is no community property between husband and wife and the husband’s property does not automatically go to the wife after his death.

24- A woman inherits half what a man inherits.

25- A man has the right to have up to 4 wives and she has no right to divorce him even if he is polygamous.

26- The dowry is given in exchange for the woman’s sexual organs.

27- A man is allowed to have sex with slave women and women captured in battle, and if the enslaved woman is married her marriage is annulled.

28- The testimony of a woman in court is half the value of a man.

29- A woman looses custody if she remarries.

30- To prove rape, a woman must have 4 male witnesses.

31- A rapist may only be required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim.

32- A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body which is considered “Awrah,” a sexual organ. Some schools of Sharia allow the face and some don’t.

33- A Muslim man is forgiven if he kills his wife caught in the act of adultery. However, the opposite is not true for women since he “could be married to the woman he was caught with.”

 
At August 31, 2010 6:20 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

«I would prefer a Muslim theocracy any day.»


disgusting!

 
At August 31, 2010 8:45 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You take allies from wherever they can be found - the greater danger is lslam. l am concerned at some point the Muslims will decide to start counter demonstrations, maybe this time. They watch and they are aware of the opposition they face. l have looked at Muslim sites and read the discussions, when they speak about the opposition they receive theyre quite incredulous that anyone would have the temerity to oppose them - and they are filled with conceit. Do not think theyre unaware, do not underestimate them, they are very determined.

 
At August 31, 2010 1:44 PM, Anonymous dauphin said...

RL seems to be taking the Left to task on the headline page, some great cartoons there too, as the very funny one of Martine Aubry you added.

http://www.ripostelaique.com/spip.php?page=sommaire

It's true anti-clerical republicanism started all this problem, but now I think secular people are waking up, and too many in the Church are taking the side of the mult-culturalists today, so I see a new political paradigm developing. I would not prefer a Muslim theocracy which will be brutal, repressive and destroy our heritage and works of art.

 
At August 31, 2010 4:03 PM, Blogger zazie said...

How CAN you? How DARE you? Don't you know what a theocracy means of misery, intolerance, mental or physical tortures....
Sans croix, bien sûr....Avec un croissant, peut-être?

 
At September 01, 2010 7:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

«I would not prefer a Muslim theocracy which will be brutal, repressive and destroy our heritage and works of art.»


look at what they did to their genetic pool with inbreeding!

 
At September 01, 2010 12:25 PM, Blogger Robert said...

Back in Paris after a year. As many as 20% of the Metro riders are white. Blacks are still entering via the rear entrances of the buses without paying their fares even though a recorded announcement has been added telling people to pay their fares. More young white mothers are pushing strollers with half black infants. Enormous posters advertising Islamic charities are in the subway stations. A major McDonalds in the center of town is boarded up. It was always packed with Africa customers and the staff played rap music in English advocating rape and murder. Youtube is now censoring videos that French regime does not like.
Gypssies have not disappeared and have gotten openly insulting. Metissage is progressing. French people over 50 look frightened of the rapid changes around them.

 
At September 01, 2010 4:09 PM, Blogger Robert said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-fsTAnmNIY&feature=player_embedded#!
Estonia
the opposite of France

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8as6Q9pYmI&NR=1
Estonia 2

 
At September 02, 2010 12:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What are these estonian songs in the videos? What are they singing?

 
At September 04, 2010 6:07 PM, Blogger Athanasius said...

First report are in of today's apéros.

Agence France Presse:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gSM3m-grCDv1Wj1imKYuttA0zlFw

leJDD.fr:

http://www.lejdd.fr/Societe/Actualite/Le-retour-rate-du-saucisson-pinard-218221/

 
At September 06, 2010 4:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

«when they speak about the opposition they receive theyre quite incredulous that anyone would have the temerity to oppose them - and they are filled with conceit.»


they are supremacists

 
At September 06, 2010 4:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

«More young white mothers are pushing strollers with half black infants.»


they don't know about sickle cell and thalassemia...


«Enormous posters advertising Islamic charities are in the subway stations.»


islamic charities finance jihad...

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home