Monday, September 20, 2010

Dumbo in Avignon




The city? Avignon. In the background, the Palace of the Popes. In the foreground, an inquisitive onlooker. And in the middle, an upside-down elephant standing on its trunk. Of course, what could be more normal in this historic city?

If you happen to visit Avignon before November 7, you too may have the pleasure of seeing this example of contemporary exuberance executed by Miquel Barceló, a Catalan artist with a sense of nonsense.

What's it doing there? Don't you remember Jeff Koons' lobster in Versailles? And Jan Fabre's something-or-other in the Louvre? This is ART. Learn to appreciate it.

A reader is very upset about this elephant in the city of the Popes, but there are indications that the Avignon of today is not the Avignon of yesteryear, when great musicians and actors gave the highest quality, often immortal, performances during the legendary summer Festivals. It has been a while since performers of that caliber have entertained audiences, and with Western values literally standing on their head, maybe this mischievous mammoth is à propos after all. At any rate he is better-looking than some of the other sites you see today in Avignon, if my reader's observations are accurate.

Barcelò is also famous (infamous?) for the ceiling of the UN's palace of nations in Geneva. The photo below gives you an idea, but you must click this link and scroll down for more. It makes the topsy-turvy Dumbo look like Rodin's Thinker, by comparison.

Labels: ,

8 Comments:

At September 20, 2010 4:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

have you seen these pieces of sh!t at the palais royal?

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_oNC0YJ3hAAo/TAuIXJM1weI/AAAAAAAAFaw/c7NtCyuEiho/s1600/Paris+Palais+Royal+Buren+4.jpg

 
At September 20, 2010 7:26 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

Yes, I'm aware of the Buren stuff. They have been there for a while now, and the French government even spent a lot of money to "restore" them not too long ago. This is all part of the "master plan" to make the great art and architecture of the past play second fiddle to the inferior output of today's non-artists. It is called by some "vampirization" where the new and clearly inferior works draw attention away from (i.e. draw blood from) the clearly superior works of the past. The past must be either eradicated or ridiculed out of existence.

I don't object to the lobster or the elephant per se, I object to the use that is made of them. They are novelties, worthless in terms of art because there is no moral dimension. There is an effort to kick the notion of moral dimension in the teeth.

 
At September 20, 2010 8:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Glass Pyramid at the Louvre.

Some of the old paving stones had to be removed, to make room for the pyramid. These paving stones were dug up, and transferred to Cergy-Pontoise, where they are now positioned in a semi-circle.


D I S G U S T I N G !

 
At September 21, 2010 3:02 AM, Blogger zazie said...

Thanks for posting this ; reading Anonymous, I am delighted to see I am not alone in my dislike -not to say hate- of "post-modern art"...
what does Anonymous think of Beaubourg, about which Aillagon recently said it is "the best architectural masterpiece of the XXth century"?
I have ad a look at the ceiling you mention in your post...brrr, beurk....

 
At September 21, 2010 5:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

what does Anonymous think of Beaubourg, about which Aillagon recently said it is "the best architectural masterpiece of the XXth century"?


this?

http://www.dhistoire-et-dart.com/PianoRogersCentrBeaubourg.jpg

it can't beat this one:

http://parisdaily.hi-fipop.com/Lippsidewalkart.jpg

 
At September 21, 2010 6:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Zazie, what do you think of Mitterrand's artistic endeavours?

http://www.cergypontoise.fr/sortir/image/photos/logoasso.jpg

 
At September 22, 2010 5:20 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

«In a 2008 interview with Italian women’s magazine Grazia Bondi admitted that he finds contemporary art puzzling.

“It’s really difficult for me to find beauty in contemporary art. If I visit a show, like many people I pretend to understand. But sincerely, I don’t understand,” he said.»

http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/CultureAndMedia/?id=3.1.976730148

 
At September 22, 2010 12:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

They are novelties, worthless in terms of art because there is no moral dimension.

There is no moral dimension in M. Sarkozy either. The elephant in Avignon is no more out of place than someone like Sarkozy is in the Elycee. Jeff Koon's lobster is no more ridiculous than the European Union. I don't blame artists for reflecting the madness of their times.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home