Monday, December 27, 2010

The Head of a King

Antiques Roadshow would love this one. Imagine finding a centuries-old mummified head in your attic and learning that it was the head of a king... and priceless. This story has made news all over the world, and there are many articles in English. Below is the version from Le Figaro, followed by a video of Prince Louis de Bourbon, explaining his role in the conservation and burial of the head. He speaks French fluently, but with a noticeable Spanish accent.

We now know more about the incredible medical-legal inquiry that permitted the authentication of a mummified head as being that of king Henri IV. Seated together behind the platform in the auditorium of the Grand Palais in Paris. Prince Louis de Bourbon, historian Jean-Pierre Babelon, Jacques Perot, president of the Société Henri IV, journalists Stéphane Gabet and Pierre Belet, and forensic doctor Philippe Charlier told with great passion their incredible adventure.

The fate of this head is a veritable saga with unexpected twists. After his assassination by François Ravaillac in 1610, the good king was buried in the Saint-Denis basilica. But in 1793, his remains were desecrated by the revolutionaries and his head cut off. From then on, it was sold to various individuals until it turned up in 1919 in Drouot, where it was acquired by photographer Joseph Emile Bourdais. Upon his death, in 1947, the Louvre Museum refused to buy the relic from his sister. After that, the relic disappeared.

"We found it sixty years later, in 2008, thanks to a series of very strange coincidences," Jean-Pierre Babelon relates mischievously. "In my house in Montmartre I've accumulated all sorts of letters on Henri IV. Fortunately, I have never given in to my dear wife who, from time to time, would gladly throw out a few of them! In 2008, Stéphane Gabet and Pierre Belet came to see me about the filming of a documentary. As they were going through the letters, they came upon a letter from an elderly couple, the Bellangers, who made some vague requests, and left only their address."

Even though the letter did not mention the head of the king, the journalists contacted them. "We weren't sure of anything. The reporter's intuition saved the day. After a year of exchanges, this extremely courteous couple finally admitted that for half a century they had kept a mummified head in a wooden box lined with purple velvet in the back of a closet! They had bought it in 1955 for 5000 francs from the sister of Bourdais. It was a well guarded secret: they hadn't even told their children. They wanted to solve the mystery themselves," smiles Stéphane Gabet.

Finally, in January 2010, with encroaching age, and on the condition that the head be returned to the direct descendant of Henri IV, the couple agreed to have their relic examined by experts. "The reporters then contacted me," confides Prince Louis de Bourbon. "I lent my moral support and consulted my address book for museums that might be interested. The twenty scientists worked for free. I helped finance the tests, the bailiffs who certified the results and the travel (to Pau, Florence...), amounting to about 10,000 euro."

The article then tells how forensic doctor Philippe Charlier, who had also worked on the cases of Jeanne d'Arc, Diane de Poitiers and Agnes Sorel employed the best experts from the perfume industry, and how they used scanners, toxology, facial reconstitution, genetics, dating... and six months later the head was declared authentic.

"Temporarily it is in a bank vault in the Paris region," revealed Prince Louis de Bourbon. "I'm going to contact President Nicolas Sarkozy in order to see to it that my ancestor rest in the royal necropolis of Saint-Denis basilica. As for the body of Henri IV, it is scattered among different museums such as the one in Pontoise that has the thumb (!), private collectors and the ossuary of Saint-Denis. It would be best if, when the head is returned, the remains of the king were restituted..."

And he added: "I hope that this reburial is an opportunity for a national reconciliation among Frenchmen. The trauma of the desecration perpetrated by the Revolution did great harm. This head is a family inheritance, but above all our national inheritance."

The video recapitulates the facts given above. But he does add near the end that he feels that the French should become better acquainted with the Saint-Denis basilica, because it is unique in Europe. And he stresses that as heir and direct descendant it is his duty to contact the French government about the reburial. The anchor addresses him as "Monseigneur."

Labels: , , ,

9 Comments:

At December 27, 2010 8:52 AM, Anonymous John McNeill said...

I would be more willing to sympathize with his family's grievances against the French Republic if he showed a willingness to stand up for his people in their darkest hour. Instead he behaves like every other European royal, remaining silent in the face of total destruction. In this, he and other royals/nobles are no different from the politicians and other heirs of the Enlightenment.

Perhaps the monarchs are silent because they do not wish to be victims of a new anti-royal backlash directed by the Left. Maybe they see Third World immigrants as useful reactionary footsoldiers. Regardless, it is truly foolish for Western traditionalists to be so nostalgic for monarchy.

 
At December 27, 2010 9:17 AM, Blogger Robert said...

When I saw the room in the Basilica of St. Denis when the desecrated remains of the Kings and queen and princes and princesses are kept ( Including St. Louis , I was overwhelmed with sadness and formed a permanent distaste for a nation that turned its history into garbage.

 
At December 27, 2010 10:54 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Finally, in January 2010, with encroaching age, and on the condition that the head be returned to the direct descendant of Henri IV, the couple agreed to have their relic examined by experts. "The reporters then contacted me," confides Prince Louis de Bourbon.

louis de bourbon is a descendant of the bastard franco!

 
At December 27, 2010 12:46 PM, Anonymous dauphin said...

Louis XX is absolutely right. In May, they had a magnificent celebration at Anet for the re-burial of Diane de Poitiers (desecrated during the revolution) which was shown on Secrets d'Histoire. If a mistress can be reburied with dignity, then certainly Henri IV !

Here is a description which can be read by English speakers. Click on the word "program" in the last paragraph to see a French site :

http://blog.catherinedelors.com/diane-de-poitiers-returns-to-her-grave/

 
At December 27, 2010 4:42 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

I admit to being nostalgic for the monarchy, buy I am also a realist. I agree completely with John McNeill that if the Prince were a true French monarch he would be much more active and proactive in the current civilizational upheaval in France and Europe. He should be writing frequent articles on the situation, defending the traditions, the moral code, the ethnic integrity of France, and reminding the people of the devastation wrought by the Revolution, especially the attempted destruction of Christianity. But he doesn't. Neither do the bishops of France (the latest story of bishops concerns the projected
statue of a naked woman opposed by some Catholics. The bisop of Tours called them "backward Cathos".)

So the Church and the Monarchy were both permanently castrated by the Revolution. This leaves only those citizens with a sense of pride in being ethnic Frenchmen and a willingness to fight - these are the only ones we can count on to wage a defensive war against the enemies of the West.

 
At December 27, 2010 5:04 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

Furthermore, I find his Spanish accent unforgivable. American mezzo-soprano Jennifer Larmore and American actress Jodi Foster speak with less of an accent than he does. I believe an accent can be worked on until it is at least barely noticeable. It is not easy but it can be done especially if the motivation is strong as it should be in this case.

Still, I'm glad he's there, with a growing family. However useless he is, he is at least a link to the past, like the head of Henri IV.

Are these relics a stimulus that will arouse an awareness of what is really happening in France today, an awareness of what the Revolution robbed the people of, or are they a metaphor for the mummified state of the West?

 
At December 27, 2010 11:50 PM, Anonymous Marc said...

M. le Duc d'Anjou's accent doesn't bother me, really, considering his personal history. How would old Henri IV's French have sounded, I wonder? my recollection is that he was raised in Navarre? and so I suspect that his French wouldn't have been entirely free of traces of les langues d'oc and even, perhaps, of 'Spanish'....

 
At December 29, 2010 10:26 PM, Blogger Theodore Harvey said...

Abandoning monarchism because today's royalty are not everything traditionalists would like them to be makes no more sense than abandoning Christianity because today's clergy are not everything traditionalists would like them to be. If Mr McNeill is an atheist or pagan (as some right-wingers are today), at least he would be consistent, but it is not fair to single out royalty when--as Tiberge has pointed out--contemporary clergy have compromised at least as much with liberalism. If anything, clergy should be judged more harshly, because they supposedly believe that their institution will last forever, whereas monarchies have no such guarantee of divine protection. Whatever the shortcomings of Louis de Bourbon or Jean d'Orléans, I will never give up on the idea of the Monarchy and will never regard the French Republic with anything other than contempt and loathing. Vive le Roi!

 
At May 22, 2012 9:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

boring

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home