Tuesday, January 18, 2011

"L'Etat, c'est Marine"


Much is being written about Marine Le Pen at the right-wing websites. Few of the reports I've read are unreservedly confident in her ability to lead the Front National as a party of tradition. Most recognize her qualities as a debater on television and her strong personality, but everyone seems to be waiting for her to let the mask fall and admit openly that she is ideologically a jacobin (meaning she is for centralized State control over everything including the regions with their separate identities, as was the French Revolution) and tolerant of Islam within the framework of "laïcité". Here is a short article from Novopress, the news agency of the Bloc Identitaire:

In her first speech as president of the Front National, Marine Le Pen launched into a veritable apology of the State, demanding a strong State ("un Etat fort"). Faced with financial markets and globalization, "the key is the State", she affirmed, adding: "France and the French people more than ever need a strong State." Lauding the "Republic that forged the nation" and enumerating "territorial, political, juridical and institutional unification and linguistic unification" the president of the Front National made references to Clovis, Henri IV, Bonaparte and even to the public schoolmasters of the Third Republic (known as "hussards noirs"). She denounced decentralization and hammered home the message that "The State has become the backbone of the France we love." Madame Le Pen even declared: "The State is one of the components of the soul of France."

Another Novopress article gives more excerpts from the speech:

In her first speech as president of the Front National, a speech that was intended as a preview of her presidential program, Marine Le Pen barely mentioned the question of immigration, which was until then the heart of the political combat of the FN. Not once does the word "immigrant" appear in her speech. The word "immigration" is used three times: in deploring that if Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Nicolas Sarkozy were the two Establishment candidates, the French people would have to choose "between immigration and immigration", and in her indignation over the "stifling and destructive stranglehold of Brussels" that leaves France no "margin for maneuver" in the matter of "immigration management."

So it seems that the new leadership of the Front National has no intention of stopping any new non-European immigration. Even less of initiating massive repatriations of immigrants to their homelands. Because of this rupture with the "foundations" of the Front National, priority will now be given to the fight against "Islamization" and "communitarianism" which, however, have always been treated in the traditional platform of the FN as being the consequences of massive immigration. Priority too to the struggle against globalization: Marine Le Pen is considering, as an example, nationalizing "those banks that are insensitive to ethical responsibilities."

Note: It is too soon to blame her. She has to be given a chance to prove herself. But her every word is being closely watched for signs that she will make of the Front National the Nationalist Left instead of the Nationalist Right.

Labels: ,

10 Comments:

At January 18, 2011 4:29 AM, Anonymous John McNeill said...

I think your words calling for patience are wise, Tiberge. I too am willing to give her a chance, even though I still have reservations. I'm sad that Bruno didn't win thought; I just watched this video, and he was flawless in making his case for humane ethnonationalism. My respect for him has skyrocketed, especially when he succeed in contrasting the FN with the mindless xenophobes found within Russia's extreme circles, as well as challenging Medvedev's civic nationalist ideas.

http://cofcc.org/2011/01/mep-bruno-gollnisch-on-rt/

 
At January 19, 2011 12:37 PM, Anonymous dauphin said...

Marine acquitted herself quite well last night on France 2 with Pujadas, I thought. It's good she has a strong character. Here's a link to the vid :

http://www.frontnational.com/?cat=53

In her speech for the FN, she was conciliatory with Gollnisch and seems to be trying to unite the party which has different strains. But she is a realist, and since much of France today is very secular, protectionist, and fairly socialist, she is tailoring her message to gain more voters. We'll see how it works as you suggest.

As to immigration, well, it may be possible to have massive repatriation of illegals, but I'm afraid it's never going to happen with legal immigrants, and I don't ever remember JMLP calling for this, only for a stop to immigration and control of our borders. I don't think the FN's position has changed, but how it is worded and packaged may be. Marine in her speech did also bring up the subject of Halal, and protested it being forced on the consumer.

It's true, the State, the Republic, like the Kingdom, has probably been a major factor in keeping France together, even when there were provinces. I also don't agree anymore with de-centralization, as I see the potential for little local fiefdoms, the increase in property taxes, etc.

To paraphrase an opponent of the American Revolution which I read about, better to have one tyrant 1000 km away, than 1000 tyrants 1 km away. I do understand the identitaires wanting to separate from Paris in order to preserve something of France, but if we each go our separate ways, what will be left?

 
At January 20, 2011 12:06 AM, Blogger tiberge said...

@dauphin

I may be comparing France too much to America where state's rights are a major dam against the floodwaters of Socialism and Centralization. Of course the State is important and can be a unifying factor. But there is a nuance between Etat and Nation. A feeling of unity, for example in time of war, proceeds from a love of one's culture and heritage, not from love of the State. So the State is in the service of the nation and it's various components.

 
At January 20, 2011 12:28 AM, Blogger tiberge said...

The State has to do right by its people. During the Algerian war De Gaulle placed "raison d'etat" above the lives of his own people. For a State to be strong it must respect its people and its heritage. This is almost impossible in a multicultural atheistic society. She will have to work at restoring the French nation.

Even though she won't change the law on abortion, she has said it should not be reimboursed. And she is strongly against gay marriage. So there are good signs.

 
At January 20, 2011 2:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its too early to judge her. l hope she is shrewd and can manipulate the media. lf she declares her positions too stridently she will be marginalised by the media. She must choose her moves intelligently and then perhaps toward the end of the campaign is the time to strike some blows - when people are least expecting to be shocked. Only the smart ones seem to win at politics and when l say smart l mean cunning like a fox and brutal. So for now she shouldnt cause big surprises.

 
At January 20, 2011 2:05 PM, Anonymous dauphin said...

@ tiberge

Oh yes, I agree. I wish she had talked about the nation instead of the state, but perhaps this was code to civil servants that they should not fear for their jobs if she were elected. (ha)

I have seen local government at work also in America, and though I understand the states rights of Republicans to protect against federal socialism, in practice I can see the danger of local mafias. Ideally the centralized state should be a protection of the civil and economic rights of citizens, and yes of lives as in Algeria (not my favorite CDG moment). But of course, America is much bigger than France too.

As to Marine (and any Resistant), I've realized that because HALDE, LICRA, etc. could effectively shut her down by embroiling her in lawsuits, fines, even prison, etc., she has to finesse her words and learn to handle the media (as anonymous above has said). Now if her father will just shut up and not embarrass her, she might have a chance. Of course I'd rather see a royalist, Catholic candidate, but she appears to have the best chance of making some impact at this point.

 
At January 20, 2011 8:38 PM, Anonymous John McNeill said...

I believe that the State is not of great importance in the protection and cultivation of identity. The nation is really the people themselves, not an institution. That institution is only a tool, and should be discarded when it is no longer in use. And being how the "French State" is largely hostile to the native French people, I think its use has expired, and ethnic French are going to have to look for something other than the State in order to cement their people together.

 
At January 24, 2011 3:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

La laïcité française, qui était de gauche au 20ème siècle, bascule à droite au 21ème siècle. Les récents propos de Marine Le Pen, brandissant le drapeau de la laïcité CONTRE les prières musulmanes dans la rue et contre le financement public des mosquées, ne sont qu’un jalon de ce renversement. Paris, capitale de la France, est devenue la capitale européenne du repli identitaire le 18 décembre dernier en accueillant les Assises sur l’islamisation.
http://www.contreculture.org/index.html

 
At November 18, 2011 3:11 PM, Anonymous Sara said...

I guess she has a different opinion and a point of view that's all. I think she also deserves credit after all she done.

 
At November 18, 2011 11:18 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ Sara

Thank you for your comment. I too feel she deserves not only credit, but the votes of the French people. I have said elsewhere that she is not the ideal president, but compared to the others, a motley crew at best, she is as close to a national savior as one can get in the current situation.

Also, the article in question in this post (from Novopress) represents just one opinion at one given moment. Marine actually has spoken out against immigration often, and the Front National was always in favor of restricted immigration.

Her job is complicated primarily by her father's role in French politics and the bad name he gave to the party. But the things he said, as bad as they were for a potential presidential candidate, are nothing compared to what "intellectuals", academics, leftists, and journalists do and say every day, with total impunity.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home