Thursday, August 09, 2012

Veiled Olympians


As I have said, I am not following the Olympics very closely, so I did not see the events mentioned in this article by Pierre Cassen posted at Novopress. Cassen, who is a founder of and contributor to Riposte Laïque, questions the motives behind the presence of veiled female participants in a sporting event purported to be not only secular but anti-religious.

The Islamization of the London Olympics does not stop. We had the story of the veiled Saudi judoka, who performed at a level unworthy of the Olympics, and the one about the veiled runner who ran the 400 meters in two minutes, when the best ones did it in 50 seconds. It is true that for Islamist countries like Saudi Arabia, it is difficult to forbid women from participating in sports and from watching a game, and at the same time to enroll veiled soldiers of Islam in international competitions.

We also have been treated to the veiled Barbie dolls, at the base of the podiums during the medals ceremonies, who, with the complicity of the Islamo-collaborators of the IOC, display their veil to the entire planet, demonstrating the Islam is everywhere.

Note: He does not say "Barbie dolls", he says "potiches", a French word designating a woman whose place in society is to look pretty and say nothing.

Why then should we be surprised in this context that for the first time in the history of the Olympic Games we have a veiled referee!

In beach volley ball (and one can wonder if this sport deserves to be in the Olympics), the Egyptian Amina Abdou Elsergany refereed, with her white veil hiding her hair, in an eighth final opposing two pair of European girls in superb bikinis.

One can wonder about the competence of this referee. Do they play beach volley ball in Egypt? Has she already officiated somewhere in another competition? If yes, was her head uncovered, or was she already dressed as a militant Islamist? Could she, dressed this way, referee competitors from Muslim countries, and could we trust her impartiality?

By allowing referees to wear a religious habit, the IOC once again violates the Olympic charter, and article 51, that forbids any political or religious propaganda. (…)

Note: It is actually article 50.3 of the Olympic charter that states:

 - No kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas.

In view of this it is interesting to note that an Australian boxer named Damien Hooper, has been reprimanded for wearing a tee-shirt depicting the Aboriginal flag. Although in 2000, at the Sydney Olympics, Cathy Freeman held both the Australian and Aboriginal flags after her victory and no one got upset.

The story about Hooper appears at The Nation, a leftist publication.

Slightly off-topic note: A reader has been sending me links to stories about the burka from the Telegraph. One deals with police injured during a row, and another about a woman charged with inciting a riot in Lille.

Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

At August 10, 2012 2:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nothing wrong with covering the hair. Nuns do that, so do nurses. It's covering the face that's different and unwelcome.

 
At August 10, 2012 5:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There was also the scandalous boxing burlesque between an Azerbaijani boxer against a japaneese competitor being refereed by an azerbaijani referee.
The Azerbaijani kissed the canvas 5 times; knocked about at will by the japaneese; yet the azerbaijani refereee ( incorruptible honorable muslims) awarded the winning ticket to the azerbaijani boxer. The japaneese federation lodged a vehement protest.

 
At August 11, 2012 5:01 AM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ anonymous 5:07

Interesting story. The Olympic Committee is out-doing itself in favoritism. I believe things like this used to happen during the Soviet era when Russian athletes were so often favored. It was especially true in the ice-skating competitions in the winter games. Russia was expected to win and usually did. Sometimes it was fair, and sometimes it was dubious.

 
At August 11, 2012 5:28 AM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ anonymous 2:50

I believe the issue is a religious one. God is absent from the Olympics, therefore, the women should not be allowed to wear the veil. However, since the veil is not required by Islam, the wearing of the Islamic veil (or headdress) is all the more audacious on their part. They are showing off their non-compulsory religious symbol to emphasize the Islamic presence.

Nuns are completely different. They have given themselves over to God. Muslim women wear veils and burkas because the Muslim community demands it, or their husbands demand it, or they are Islamic activists who, as indicated above, make their presence felt through the habit they wear.

You don't see nuns referring at the Olympics, or doing sprints.

As for nurses, the issue is hygiene, just as cooks in a restaurant have to cover their hair. It is also a question of neatness - we used to expect nurses to be dressed in white starched uniforms, and to be models of professionalism and cleanliness. Unfortunately, today, they do not always live up to that former standard.

However, in fairness, I must say that the European women at these Olympics, from the photos I've seen, have exposed their bodies in such an offensive and exhibitionist manner, that veils (and even blankets) would be welcome!

 
At August 11, 2012 6:18 AM, Blogger tiberge said...

This comment from a reader appeared at Lawrence Auster's VFR today. I certainly agree with what she says about the equestrians.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/023013.html


- I, too, have pretty much given up on watching sports, the Olympics included. It’s a largely aesthetic distaste for me—I don’t like to see near-naked men or women sweating profusely. It’s like watching prisoners on a chain gang in the southern U.S. Their muscular over-development looks grotesque to me—I’ve never seen anyone who looks that way in my day-to-day existence, and if I encountered one I’d want to get away. The Olympic events I can still enjoy are the equestrian ones: a man or woman riding a horse is a noble sight. And they are punctilious in following tradition: jackets, riding pants, boots, hats. Not yet have we seen someone wearing a wifebeater and speedo riding a horse “because it cuts down wind resistance” and will give them a competitive edge, though I suppose it won’t be long before someone argues they should be allowed to try. To me, this sort of traditional habit adds to the pleasure, BECAUSE it makes the job more difficult. It’s like enjoying a sonnet—the more constricting the rules, the higher the skill required to succeed.

I’ve also come to enjoy golf because of its old-fashioned rules of decorum, though inroads are being made there too. I like it when a winning athlete can look calm and dignified at the moment of triumph. Baseball used to have this sort of civilized air as well; a winning pitcher didn’t scream and jump around, he’d just take off his hat in a gesture of acknowledgement to the crowd. I remember an anecdote about a football coach admonishing his players against leaping and whooping when getting a touchdown: “When you get to the endzone, don’t make it look as if you’ve never been there before” but I don’t think anyone pays any attention to that advice anymore. I now avoid most sports just because I don’t want to witness the “animalisation” of human beings.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home