Friday, November 09, 2012

The Tout-Paris Can Breathe Easy

The French are amazed at this - racial statistics out in the open. They now know what we all know - that the election was won on loyalty from various ethnic groups to Barack Obama, not to America. Whites voted less on sectarian grounds, since their votes were spread out - most to Romney, a fair portion to Obama, and some to other parties. 

A reminder that François Hollande defeated Nicolas Sarkozy only because 93% of French Muslims voted for the Socialist. 

Christine Tasin tells us that the Tout-Paris heaved a sigh of relief when the results came in:

It's not going to simplify the lives of the patriots, since Obama favors Islam at all costs, meddles in affairs that are none of his business, and lectures the French, among others, on Islamic veils. And it means that Saudi Arabia, Qatar and company will continue to receive aid and support from the United States to make mayhem in the Middle East, and sustain the emergence of the Muslim Brotherhood and other salafists in Muslim countries, but also, and especially, in Europe.

It means that the European Commission that eats from the hand of its Big American Brother will continue its job of destroying the Nation-States, and encouraging the destruction of small businesses and the notion of public service, for the greater good of speculators of all stripes, including of course the pension funds of the Anglo-Saxons.

Note: Someone explain to me what she means by the reference to Anglo-Saxon pension funds.

You can't go wrong if you read the reaction from 2008 of Bernard Kouchner, one of the worst Islamo-globalist-collaborators who ever held sway in France in recent years: "This victory of Obama is a victory over the extreme Right, a victory over racism in the entire world." We have no illusions. The bobos and the gogos (i.e., the radical chic and the gullible), like this emasculated pundit Kouchner, will again see in the re-election of Obama only the symbol of their imbecilic fight against a so-called extreme Right that has never really threatened anybody, if indeed it has ever existed at all. Therefore, the Tout-Paris is relieved: the nice black guy defeated the mean white man.

We now know that the so-called fight against racism was invented both to allow Mitterand to win the elections but also, and especially, to impose the multicultural society of which the unstated objective is the Great Replacement, diagnosed by Renaud Camus. 

Note: The "Great Replacement" refers of course to the replacement of the white Europeans by non-Europeans, both black and Maghrebins.

She concludes:

Obama or not, No pasaran!

Note: "¡No pasarán!" is Spanish for "they shall not pass". Check Wikipedia for a history of this much-used slogan.

Christine Tasin is probably using it in its most basic sense - "we will stand our ground". But the slogan is sometimes connected to the No Pasaran Network created in 1984 in Toulouse, France, by a wildly left-wing anti-fascist, anti-Zionist, anti-Le Pen group of young radicals. It has been used all over the world, in Dresden, England, Spain, Kosovo and Estonia, in various contexts.

Marine Le Pen issued this succinct communiqué:

Marine Le Pen, president of the National Front, addresses her congratulations to Mr. Barack Obama, on his re-election to the presidency of the United States.

The National Front wishes the second term to be an opportunity to deepen the relations between our two countries in terms of the mutual understanding of our respective national interests.

I think she's saying that what she cares about are the best interests of France - and he'd better remember that!

Note: I like Marine's new poster: "Another Voice". Behind her we see the interchangeable clones of French politics: Jean-François Copé, Jean-Marc Ayrault, François Fillon, François Hollande, Nicolas Sarkozy, Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

Labels: , , , , ,


At November 09, 2012 3:59 PM, Anonymous King Lear said...

Whites still constitute the majority of the USA population. Most do not feel the need to organize and vote along ethnic lines while non-white minorities plainly do. It is very easy for whites to be 'tolerant' while they are the majority but what happens when that situation changes? What happens when the non-whites have the whip hand over the white man?

We will find out soon enough.

At November 10, 2012 12:55 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are organizations all over Europe connected to the newly elected one. Persons such as Rokhaya something, belongs to one of these organizations, if I am not much mistaken. They are trained in their residential countries, and in Washington.

"Nothing is going to stop us now"

There seems to be these individuals of the correct darkish color picked out to be placed in different strategic positions to be seen in the media for certain brainwashing "Get-used-to-it!" purposes

At November 10, 2012 2:48 AM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ anonymous 12:55

I believe Valerie Jarrett, the dark-skinned (not very dark) close adviser of Obama said something like that. "Now it's our turn" (not sure of her exact words). Very ominous.

At November 10, 2012 11:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, tiberge, "Revenge, Payback-time" is what is on their minds. Crazy.
"After we win this election, it's our turn. Payback time", she said.

- What else..?
fds on financing CCIF
"Au Micro de Beur FM, Marwan Muhammad reconnait que la campagne d’affichage « Nous sommes la nation » a été financée par l’officine mondialiste de George Soros : L’«Open Society Foundation» ."

At November 10, 2012 1:50 PM, Anonymous dauphin said...

@ tiberge

I think Anglo-Saxon pension funds refers to things like 401K in America, meaning rising global corporate value at the expense of local businesses.

I'm glad Christine realizes the dangerous effect of an Obama victory for France, particularly the meddling to pick future leaders from the banlieues. I wish some in the FN understood this.

I like Marine's new poster too. I think "respective national interests" is clear.

At November 11, 2012 3:46 PM, Anonymous fnn said...

Whites still constitute the majority of the USA population. Most do not feel the need to organize and vote along ethnic lines while non-white minorities plainly do.

Whites are already the minority in many parts of the US. Current social norms effectively prohibit them from organizing on the basis of racial group interest like everyone else does.

Kevin MacDonald blames-at least in part-the Puritan legacy:
The Puritan legacy in American culture is indeed pernicious, especially since the bar of morally correct behavior has been continually raised to the point that any white group identification has been pathologized. As someone with considerable experience in the academic world, I can attest to feeling like a wayward heretic back in seventeenth-century Massachusetts when confronted, as I often am, by academic thought police. It’s the moral fervor of these people that stands out. The academic world has become a Puritan congregation of stifling thought control, enforced by moralistic condemnations that a seventeenth-century Puritan minister could scarcely surpass. In my experience, this thought control is far worse in the East coast colleges and universities founded by the Puritans than elsewhere in academia—a fitting reminder of the continuing influence of Puritanism in American life.

At November 11, 2012 6:01 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ fnn

I cannot disagree with what you say. I would only add that there is also a puritanical Left that uses the same methods as the original Puritans, but without any real ideological connection to them. Today's Left is puritanical, interested only in purging the society of any element they find sinful - i.e., any remnant of our traditional culture. So for the puritanical Left, a perfect society is a mongrelized, non-thinking, emasculated, sexually promiscuous but infertile, system of "life", that will soon lead to death.

The North has always been carpet-bagging and self-righteous about blacks, looking with contempt at the South, that was much more realistic. Now the North and its universities are exerting terroristic control over the whole country, and here as in France, the left-wing intellectuals from self-righteous universities form public opinion and go on witch hunts.

Now, one last thought. Maybe the Puritans and the Communists do have something in common ideologically? I don't know, but is it possible?

At November 11, 2012 6:44 PM, Anonymous RoyalisteCadien said...

"Now, one last thought. Maybe the Puritans and the Communists do have something in common ideologically? I don't know, but is it possible?"

Well, just off the top of my head, the Puritans and the Communists both deny either the value, existence, or effect of free will. Calvinists have their TULIP formula, and Communists have their unbreakable laws of historical progression. In my experience, most Protestants besides Anglicans tend to despise social distinction, especially that of pre-modern Europe and the Catholic Church. In the case of Calvinists, it is idolatrous and obscene for one man to bow before another, since all are radically corrupted by sin and have no redress for this unless they are lucky enough to be members of the Elect.

Perhaps it is in the determinism of both groups that they find their commonality. Both have little appreciation for personal histories and differences (lineage, intelligence, etc.), both are very absolute on this score, and both are incredibly self-righteous in their prosecution of their beliefs (or so I have experienced). What could be more hateful to both an ardent Communist and a zealous Puritan (or Huguenot) than a devout subject kneeling before the sacred person of the King ? What would be more odious than what I do every year on 11 November, which is honour St Martin de Tours on his festival day with a large meal and some good wine, usually at some expense ?

Distinction, hierarchy, heroes, admission of superiority and inferiority, recognizing the special power of another in a patron-client relationship -- these things are offensive to the egalitarian and deterministic sense of both Puritans and Communists. Ultimately, these people reject the natural and supernatural orders altogether. Louis XIV called the Huguenots "a republican party in Church and State." History corroborates his statement : the Jacobin ideology of universal liberation and cooperation was formulated and advanced by the descendants of old Huguenot families of the bourgeoisie. The exact lineages of the Communists, Huguenots/Puritans, Républicains, United-Statesians, and the merchant/bureaucrat class is unclear. It suffices to know that they're all bastards related by incest.

I hope that helps further the conversation on this point. I admit that the direct link is not very strong.

At November 11, 2012 8:45 PM, Blogger tiberge said...

@ RoyalisteCadien,

A very informative and helpful reply, and I thank you. Another thought - this "new" type of puritanism, as exemplified by the Communists, and now the other "ists" such as feminists, homosexualists, anti-racists, anti-discriminationists, anti-religionists, contains within its ranks ISLAM! How will our zealous, sexually promiscuous, homosexual, transsexual etc... religion-hating witch hunters adapt to Islam?

The answer may lie in the nature of the totalitarian mentality itself. It will recognize in Islam a fellow traveler that has the same goals as the New Puritans themselves - the destruction of the traditional society and morality. So they will close their eyes to the evils of Islam and justify them on grounds that Christianity is just as bad, since one of their goals is and has been the destruction of Christianity. What happens then, I don't know. As the New Puritans drink more and more Kool-Aid, they will become more and more easy to enslave, and they will eventually become the non-sentient workers of the Caliphate. It's happening already - do feminists protest when female reporters are gang-raped by Muslims? Was Benghazi covered up in America by the Left? Do homosexuals decry the intolerance of Islam (a few do - but not many). And last but not least, look at how Islam behaved during the French election - 93% of street-wise Muslims voted for Hollande, hence for someone like Taubira and her gay marriage agenda! And I would bet that THEY too would close their eyes to the sexual mores of the New Puritans if it meant the total annihilation of the Christian moral code.

The inability of human reason to prefer a better solution to a worse one mystifies me. We're perverse - we're made that way. Or do we choose it? I believe in Free Will, and yet that will is not entirely free. It is still shackled to something in the past and cannot ever entirely break the bond except through death and the working out of Karma - which may take 25,000 years (or so).

Now regarding the connection between the original Puritans and the Communists, it may not be ideological. Is it safe to say that the Puritans rebelled against what they saw as excesses in Catholicism - excessive sloth, lust, indifference to the text of the Bible, greed, etc...? And so they sought a purer form of Christianity, purged of its hedonism. On the other hand, the Communists are in a perpetual rebellion against the Father, the Fatherland, the Patrimony, the idea of being disciplined by one's family and school, and they literally see "red" when they observe (as they cannot help but observe) the obvious inequality of human intelligences, behaviors and abilities, especially along racial lines.

It's hard to say. It becomes impossible to pinpoint because many Communists are family men loyal to their wives, with good educations. And many Protestants are now left-wingers who have completely abandoned the original aims of the Puritans. They justify what they do by saying that gay pastors, lesbian pastors, gay marriage, etc... are really corrections to an excess, but this doesn't fly at all.

I may be really off-topic now. Feel free to comment.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home